Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

[Jon Awbrey]

Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/01/26/survey-of-semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-5/

All,

C.S. Peirce defines “logic” as “formal semiotic”, using “formal” to
distinguish the role of logic as a normative science, over and above
the descriptive study of signs and their role in wider fields of play.
Understanding logic as Peirce understands it thus requires a companion
study of semiotics, semiosis, and sign relations.

What follows is a Survey of blog and wiki resources on the theory of signs,
variously known as “semeiotic” or “semiotics”, and the actions referred to
as “semiosis” which transform signs among themselves in relation to their
objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce's concept of triadic sign relations.

Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

Elements —

• Semeiotic ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Semeiotic )

• Sign Relations ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation )

Sources —

C.S. Peirce • On the Definition of Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-on-the-definition-of-logic/

C.S. Peirce • Logic as Semiotic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-logic-as-semiotic/

C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-objective-logic/

Blog Series —

• Semeiotic ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/30/semeiotic/ )

Regards,

Jon

cc: https://www.academia.edu/community/ln9YwL
cc: https://mathstodon.xyz/@Inquiry/111822550270837874