Constraints and Indications

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Jon Awbrey

unread,
Jul 3, 2024, 9:40:23 AM7/3/24
to Cybernetic Communications, Laws of Form, Structural Modeling, SysSciWG
Constraints and Indications • 1
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/02/constraints-and-indications-1-a/

All,

The system‑theoretic concept of “constraint” is one that unifies
a manifold of other notions — definition, determination, habit,
information, law, predicate, regularity, and so on. Indeed, it
is often the best way to understand the entire complex of concepts.

Entwined with the concept of “constraint” is the concept of “information”,
the power signs bear to reduce uncertainty and advance inquiry. Asking what
consequences those ideas have for Peirce’s theory of triadic sign relations
led me some years ago to the thoughts recorded on the following page.

Pragmatic Semiotic Information
https://oeis.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Semiotic_Information

Here I am thinking of the concept of constraint that constitutes one of the
fundamental ideas of classical cybernetics and mathematical systems theory.

For example, here is how W. Ross Ashby introduces the concept of constraint
in his Introduction to Cybernetics (1956).

❝A most important concept, with which we shall be much concerned later,
is that of “constraint”. It is a relation between two sets, and occurs
when the variety that exists under one condition is less than the variety
that exists under another. Thus, the variety of the human sexes is 1 bit;
if a certain school takes only boys, the variety in the sexes within the
school is zero; so as 0 is less than 1, constraint exists.❞ (1964 ed.,
p. 127).

At its simplest, then, constraint is an aspect of the subset relation.

The objective of an agent, organism, or similar regulator is to keep within
its viable region, a particular subset of its possible state space. That is
the constraint of primary interest to the agent.

Reference —

• Ashby, W.R. (1956), Introduction to Cybernetics, Methuen, London, UK.

Resources —

Survey of Cybernetics
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/01/25/survey-of-cybernetics-4/

Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/02/28/survey-of-inquiry-driven-systems-6/

Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/03/01/survey-of-pragmatic-semiotic-information-8/

Regards,

Jon

cc: https://www.academia.edu/community/VrKv7y

Jon Awbrey

unread,
Jul 7, 2024, 7:00:28 AM7/7/24
to Cybernetic Communications, Laws of Form, Structural Modeling, SysSciWG
Constraints and Indications • 2
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/04/constraints-and-indications-2-a/

Re: Constraints and Indications • 1
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/07/02/constraints-and-indications-1-a/

All,

Coping with collaboration, communication, context, integration,
interoperability, perspective, purpose, and the reality of the
information dimension demands a transition from conceptual
environments bounded by dyadic relations to those informed
by triadic relations, especially the variety of triadic
sign relations employed by pragmatic semiotics.

Along the lines of my first post on this topic I am presently
concerned with the logical and mathematical requirements of
dealing with constraints but when it comes to the constraints
involved in communicating across cultural and disciplinary
barriers I could recommend a paper Susan Awbrey and I wrote
for a conference devoted to those very issues.

Conference Presentation —

Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (1999), “Organizations of Learning
or Learning Organizations : The Challenge of Creating Integrative
Universities for the Next Century”, Second International Conference
of the Journal ‘Organization’, Re‑Organizing Knowledge, Trans‑Forming
Institutions : Knowing, Knowledge, and the University in the 21st Century,
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
https://cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/awbrey/integrat.htm

Published Paper —

Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (2001), “Conceptual Barriers to Creating
Integrative Universities”, Organization : The Interdisciplinary Journal of
Organization, Theory, and Society 8(2), Sage Publications, London, UK, 269–284.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350508401082013
https://www.academia.edu/1266492/Conceptual_Barriers_to_Creating_Integrative_Universities
cc: https://www.academia.edu/community/5AER91
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages