--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "strelka-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to strelka-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to strelka-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/strelka-discuss/86cf2c6a-5d10-4af0-9972-aa7f57041e68%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi, Rajesh.Silly question, but did you disable depth filters in both cases? And just so the list knows, what version of Strelka are you using?Sean
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Rajesh Patidar <rajbtp...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,I have a sample where we did exome as well as Panel and there is one Indel which is called in exome but not called in panel seq at all. its not even in all.somatic.indels.vcfthe input bam file for tumor and normal all have good coverage in Exome (>400X) and >700X in Panel, the indel is found to be at 13% in Exome and ~10% of reads show the same in panel sequencing.Could you please suggest what should I do here.I could send you the portion of bam files for the position if that helps investigating it further.Thanks a lot.Rajesh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "strelka-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to strelka-discu...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to strelka...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/strelka-discuss/86cf2c6a-5d10-4af0-9972-aa7f57041e68%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.