Essential:
Barbara N.
Ramusack, The Indian Princes and their
States, Delhi, 1978. [Use this as the main reading for the topic. It covers most of the issues we have discussed in class].
Hira Singh,
‘Colonial and Postcolonial Historiography and the Princely States: Relations of
Power and Rituals of Legitimation’, Waltraud Ernst and Biswamoy Pati, eds., India’s
Princely States: People, Princes and Colonialism, Indian edition, New
Delhi, 2009. [regarding the issue of 'indirect rule']
Bernard Cohn,
‘Representing Authority in Victorian India’, in E.J. Hobsbawm and Terence
Ranger (eds.), The Invention of Tradition,
Cambridge, 1983. [Also in An Anthropologist
Among the Historians] [on the 1877 durbar]
David
Cannadine, Ornamentalism: How the British
Saw their Empire, Oxford, 2002. [titles, ceremonial, rituals, cult of Victoria, feudal hierarchy]
Dick Kooiman,
‘The Guns of Travancore or How Much Powder May a Maharaja Blaze Away?, IESHR, 43, 3 (2006), pp.301-322. [on gun-salutes]
Additional:
Manu Bhagavan, Sovereign
Spheres: Princes, Education and Empire in Colonial India, New Delhi, 2003. [particularly for Baroda]
Nicholas Dirks,
The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom, Cambridge, 1987. [I am giving the reference since Hira Singh discusses the thesis of this book in some detail, and critiques it]
Sebastian Joseph, ‘A Service Elite Against the Peasants—Encounter and Collision (Mysore 1799-1831)’, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Bombay Session, 1980, pp.670-81.