Plural handling needs work
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Cris
May 9, 2012, 12:34:07 PM5/9/12
to strategies...@googlegroups.com
This issue applies to WDK 2.2
The plural tag doesn't handle plurals well. This is quite noticeable in the case where the record type used is Study. We get Studys popping up everywhere. In some cases (see question.jsp) an 's' was simply slapped onto the back of a record type name. We've addressed these problems by overwriting the plural tag and applying the tag everywhere it is needed. But the original and the overwrite both seem like hacks. One suggestion was to allow the user to indicate the proper plural for a record type (maybe an optional 'types' to correspond with 'type' in the model of a record with the implied default being just the type with an 's')?
The plural tag doesn't handle plurals well. This is quite noticeable in the case where the record type used is Study. We get Studys popping up everywhere. In some cases (see question.jsp) an 's' was simply slapped onto the back of a record type name. We've addressed these problems by overwriting the plural tag and applying the tag everywhere it is needed. But the original and the overwrite both seem like hacks. One suggestion was to allow the user to indicate the proper plural for a record type (maybe an optional 'types' to correspond with 'type' in the model of a record with the implied default being just the type with an 's')?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages