Dear Rutger
How would you feel about being one of the three groups to present their plan for class discussion on Saturday? I was initially thinking of excluding your topic, despite its undoubted interest, because of potential confidentiality, but now I see there is no apparently sensitive data there. Let me know your thoughts. If you are willing, I will reply with a more detailed brief. Might be good to include the rest of your group, depending upon how involved they were in the paper.
I assume you have read the Economist lead article this week? Might this be additional prep material for the class?
Best
David_______________________________
David Arnold | Adjunct Professor | MarketingLondon Business School | Regent's Park | London NW1 4SA | United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7000 8614 | Mobile +44 (0)7976 018 538 | Email dar...@london.edu
On 17 Nov 2013, at 20:54, Rutger Zonneveld <rmzon...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear David,
Please find attached our marketing plan. I received a turnitin email for this course but when I logged in it said 'final exam' so I assumed that link wasn't for this assignment.If you do want me to submit through turnitin then please let me know and happy to do so.
Thanks,Rutger
<Google Glass_MKT PLAN_group 5.pdf>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "strada" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to strada2014+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Dear Rutger
Excellent - thanks very much. If the presentation involves a few of your group, so much the better. I agree with your point about trying to stick to the marketing issues rather than the wider social issues, and will brief the class accordingly. My plan as it stands would have you presenting second out of the three groups. Here's the brief:
My objective in organizing these presentations is (for you) to allow the experience of the group to be applied to interesting marketing questions, and (for the audience) to experience exposure to new marketing situations and test their ability to identify the key points. In terms of your presentation, therefore, I suggest that (a) you keep background to the minimum required to understand the ongoing issues - dive straight in; (b) you raise the challenges facing the business, and then ask for opinions from the large group, before you present your own ideas on a strategy for moving forward; (c) you conclude with your own thoughts on the way forward. The most important point is that you adopt a teaching rather than a reporting approach, i.e. outline the questions, and then present them to the class. Report/present your own thoughts only at the end of the slot. I do not expect you to prepare any new materials, but simply to use excerpts from your paper.
I suggest that you open by framing it as a challenge to overcome the innovator's curse, as in your paper, because that will raise the technology-driven vs. customer-driven dilemma, which is at the heart of this. You might also offer some thoughts on the customer unmet need that is being addressed, and I like your segments (Potentials, Skeptics, etc). I suggest you the throw it open to the class before you get on to positioning. Then at some point you need to take back control of the discussion and present your own conclusions on the way forward.
This is only a suggestion, so feel free to tell the story another way if you want, but please bear in mind my objectives.
My plan is for 25 minutes for each of the 3 groups who will present. You don't need me to tell you that this is a very participative group full of ideas, which will present a challenge in terms of time management, so please plan accordingly, i.e. beware the danger of preparing too much presentation material. A few slides from the report will be enough. It's up to you to decide which team members present.
Please let me know whether you are happy with this plan, and whether there are any other questions.
Best regards,
David
P.S. 'Glasshole' had me laughing out loud!
_______________________________
David Arnold | Adjunct Professor | Marketing
London Business School | Regent's Park | London NW1 4SA | United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7000 8614 | Mobile +44 (0)7976 018 538 | Email dar...@london.edu
On 20 Nov 2013, at 15:00, Rutger Zonneveld <rmzon...@gmail.com>wrote:
Dear David,
Would love to!
Yes, I asked for internal data/info from our Google X team (where Glass sits) but they weren't very forthcoming (as expected:)).Definitely a team effort so there would probably be a few of us up there.
Yes, interesting article and great idea to have the class read that. I think it's tempting with this topic to drift into a wider discussion about how much privacy we're willing to give up in return for a safer, more convenient society. But given the context of the course it would be more interesting (I think) to instead focus on the marketing challenge of convincing people that technology is a good thing (when used correctly).
Thanks,Rutger
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:10 PM, David Arnold <dar...@london.edu> wrote:
Dear Rutger
How would you feel about being one of the three groups to present their plan for class discussion on Saturday? I was initially thinking of excluding your topic, despite its undoubted interest, because of potential confidentiality, but now I see there is no apparently sensitive data there. Let me know your thoughts. If you are willing, I will reply with a more detailed brief. Might be good to include the rest of your group, depending upon how involved they were in the paper.
I assume you have read the Economist lead article this week? Might this be additional prep material for the class?
Best
David
_______________________________
David Arnold | Adjunct Professor | Marketing
London Business School | Regent's Park | London NW1 4SA | United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7000 8614 | Mobile +44 (0)7976 018 538 | Email dar...@london.edu
London Business School | Regent's Park | London NW1 4SA | United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7000 8614 | Mobile +44 (0)7976 018 538 | Email dar...@london.edu