ILMerge NUnit

[Heinrich Breedt]

Would you consider ILMerging Nunit, so that i can use a different
version of nunit in the rest of my project?

Is there any difficulties that im not considering?

Btw. great tool!

Heinrich

[Dru Sellers]

Or leverage that assertions only framework. I think it is shoulda?

-d

[Heinrich Breedt]

are you think of shouldly? http://snappyco.de/articles/2010-02-02-shouldly

--
Heinrich Breedt

“Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.” - William B. Sprague

[David Foley]

Hello.

I'm going to remove the dependency on NUnit in the next version of StorEvil (for the production code that is, I will still use NUnit for the storevil unit tests themselves).

This dependency is already gone from master on github.

Cheers

Dave

[Heinrich Breedt]

ah cool, tx :)

[Heinrich Breedt]

just had a look, and the storevil.core still has a dependency on nunit, which means that it will clash my version of nunit

[Dru Sellers]

Yeah

-d

[David Foley]

Ah yeah, I suppose it does.

I'll look at this later today. One of the things I want to look at soon is running StorEvil on Mono, and I'm not sure if ILMerge supports that. 

For now, I might just fix the two references to NUnit to use reflection to late-bind to whatever version of NUnit is  local (if present), and remove the dependency.

[Dave F]

OK, I have removed the NUnit dependency.

I'm not 100% happy with the result, but I like it better than the
previous situation.

The actual bits of NUnit code that StorEvil uses are Assert.Fail and
Assert.Ignore.

Now what happens is that if an nunit assembly is found, it is loaded
via reflection and Assert.Fail or Assert.Ignore is invoked.
If no NUnit assembly is found, StorEvil.AssertionException or
StorEvil.IgnoreException is thrown instead.

Now the only external dependencies are on Funq and Spark.

If anyone has a problem with either of these dependencies, let me know
and we'll figure out a way to work around.

Cheers
Dave

On Aug 16, 8:06 pm, Heinrich Breedt <heinrichbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just had a look, and the storevil.core still has a dependency on nunit,
> which means that it will clash my version of nunit
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Heinrich Breedt

> <heinrichbre...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ah cool, tx :)

>
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, David Foley <davidmfo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Hello.
>
> >> I'm going to remove the dependency on NUnit in the next version of
> >> StorEvil (for the production code that is, I will still use NUnit for the
> >> storevil unit tests themselves).
>
> >> This dependency is already gone from master on github.
>
> >> Cheers
> >> Dave
>
> >> On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Heinrich Breedt wrote:
>
> >> are you think of shouldly?
> >>http://snappyco.de/articles/2010-02-02-shouldly
>
> >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Dru Sellers <d...@drusellers.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Or leverage that assertions only framework. I think it is shoulda?
>
> >>> -d
>

> >>> On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Heinrich Breedt <heinrichbre...@gmail.com>