Women's reservation bill reserving seats instead of candidates is not in the best interests of the nationGovernment
intervention is necessary, at least for a short time to address key
structural issues in a society until it is no longer needed. However,
the concept of reservation has taken on a life of its own in Bharath,
hurting its national interests, its advancement. What started as a 10
years period of reservation for Scheduled castes and tribes has now
become a perpetual reservation even when there are those in other
communities whose situation is no different for generations since
independence. This was extended to backward castes that today people
are identified with labels of 'caste' fueling divisions in the society
based on their ancestral occupations that have little relevance to
today's realities. Instead of addressing primary education we went
about reserving seats in higher education and jobs that deprive many
deserving candidates whose economic plight is no different than those
who benefit from the 'reserved' category while seriously jeopardizing
quality. It seems Indian democracy is too afflicted with the disease of
reservations. We are not building a nation of equal opportunity for
all citizens, but a citizens of classes where one class takes advantage
of the other solely based on their ancestry, no matter how much things
have changed.
No one contends that there is a strong need for
larger representation of women in the political arena but is the
situation dire that there needs to reserve 33% of seats at all levels.
Are we now going to assign certain constituencies, even if we devise a
rotating scheme, as only available for female candidates? Per media
reports, today there are 14% of women in Lok sabha and Rajya Sabha and
while this needs to be improved, it can be easily done by encouraging or
even mandating a certain number of women candidates by all parties
contesting in national elections. This is what is called Gill's formula
who was a Chief Election commissioner and who is believed to have
suggested this. This kind of arrangement would motivate parties to
field best candidates for the seats instead of assigning a constituency
based on gender which deprives a deserving male candidate. At least
this should have been given a chance before we rush into reserving
constituencies.
The case in State assemblies where the
situation is much lacking, particularly in states with poor records such
as Kerala, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Assam, and others, perhaps a
combination can be used where the parties have to give a certain number
of tickets to women candidates with a percentage of constituencies
assigned for female candidates only for a certain period of time.
Such careful schemes can be designed at Panchayat elections instead of
one formula at all levels.
Our goal should be that we should
not sacrifice getting the best people running the institutions of the
country while being sensitive to the realities of the ground. Otherwise
it will lead to compromising the larger interests of the nation
itself. We cannot expect to become a superPower, or even accelerate the
expansion of our economy unless we get those with the best capabilities
to rise to the top. We cannot build a nation of people who strongly
identify with their nation unless we remove the system that identifies
citizens with labels and we cannot address inequalities by replacing
them with other inequalities.
Regards,
Satya Dosapati
Bio:
Satya
Dosapati is an activist based in the US working on causes for both
India and US. He played a critical role in the introduction of paper
trail for India’s Electronic Voting Machines called VVPAT in 2010 that
put Indian democracy on a strong foothold. This was done by bringing in
top international experts and demonstrating the vulnerabilities in
Indian EVMs working with local organizations and CEC Qureshi. He
organized an All American Rally for Trump bringing in various ethnic
communities together in support of the Trump Presidential Election that
was acknowledged by the Republican party and then candidate Trump. The
event was covered by most of the US national media in Pennsylvania. He
is well known for challenging 100 and 30 million dollar lawsuits from
Sonia Gandhi proxies in the US when he coordinated a UN protest against
Sonia Gandhi posing to represent Mahatma Gandhi values at UN and taking a
full page Ad in New York Times exposing her. He has several successes
in activist movements such as forcing Andhra Pradesh CM YSR in 2007 in
banning conversions inside Hindu temples, bringing attention to the
plight of backward caste minor girls in West Bengal being kidnapped and
thrown into sexual slavery through love jihad. He led a protest against
University of Pennsylvania (Wharton economic forum) for dropping
Narendra Modi from keynote speech because of false allegations of some
leftist professors and got a (private) apology from UPenn President .
He initiated the first anti-corruption conference working with Ajit
Doval and Dr. Swamy before Anna Hazare protest at New Delhi Vivekananda
International foundation and brought in top international
anti-corruption Organizations personnel from UN (UNODC) and Europe
(Eurodad) and other institutions. His presentation on Plunder of India
by Sonia UPA received nearly 2 lacs hits. He was also engaged in animal
rights movements in the US for health, environment, and compassion. He
received his bachelors from IIT Chennai with graduate degrees in the US
and is pursuing a career in Telecom in the US. His Koo id is
@SatyaDosapati and several of his articles were published in First Post,
PGurus and OpIndia news portals. His blog is https://SatyaBlog.org.