STOMP extensions?

[Chris Barrow]

Hi all,

Hiram said the following in a recent post: "The STOMP spec does not
explicitly define a way to finely control the flow of messages of a
subscription but implementations are free add extensions to support that
functionality".

That leads me to question I have been wanting to ask for a while. Are
there any plans to introduce formal support for extensions to the STOMP
protocol? This could be done in a similar way to the way is done in the
WebSocket protocol, i.e. new "accept-extensions" header in the CONNECT
frame to request extensions, new "extensions" header in the CONNECTED
frame where the server states which of the requested extensions are active.

thanks,
Chris

[Hiram Chirino]

Sound like a good idea.  Perhaps for ver 2 of the spec?

--

Hiram Chirino

Software Fellow | FuseSource Corp.

chi...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com

skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo