Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
20 views
Skip to first unread message
Kirsten Foster
May 10, 2013, 10:35:57 AM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
I've just received a letter thanking me for my comments on the Wilmer Pl application and duplicating the previous letters about this saying I'd be notified if it went to committee etc. (see attached - let me know if it doesn't come through)
I haven't (obviously) submitted any comment on the new plans submitted, so is this a mistake?!---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk>
Date: 10 May 2013 15:23
Subject: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
To: kirstens...@gmail.com
You have received this email from Hackney Council (Planning Service) in relation to a planning matter at Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH.
The attached correspondence contains important information; please retain it for your records.
If you would like to respond, please reply to plan...@hackney.gov.uk.
In any correspondence, please quote the Council reference number, which is included in the attached letter.
If you have received this email in error, please forward it to plan...@hackney.gov.uk.
If you cannot open the attachment you can download the following software free of charge:
- Microsoft Word Viewer for Word attachments.
- Adobe Reader for PDF attachments.
Hackney Council may exercise its right to intercept any communication, the only exception to this would be confidential survey data, with any employee or agent of the Council using its telephony or data networks.
By using these networks you give your consent to Hackney Council monitoring and recording your communication.
If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and contact the sender.
For further information about Hackney Council policies please contact Hackney Service Centre on: 020 8356 3000
From: <noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk>
Date: 10 May 2013 15:23
Subject: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
To: kirstens...@gmail.com
You have received this email from Hackney Council (Planning Service) in relation to a planning matter at Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH.
The attached correspondence contains important information; please retain it for your records.
If you would like to respond, please reply to plan...@hackney.gov.uk.
In any correspondence, please quote the Council reference number, which is included in the attached letter.
If you have received this email in error, please forward it to plan...@hackney.gov.uk.
If you cannot open the attachment you can download the following software free of charge:
- Microsoft Word Viewer for Word attachments.
- Adobe Reader for PDF attachments.
Hackney Council may exercise its right to intercept any communication, the only exception to this would be confidential survey data, with any employee or agent of the Council using its telephony or data networks.
By using these networks you give your consent to Hackney Council monitoring and recording your communication.
If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and contact the sender.
For further information about Hackney Council policies please contact Hackney Service Centre on: 020 8356 3000
--
Kirsten Foster
kirstens...@gmail.com
+44 (0)7553092688
Tom Albu
May 10, 2013, 11:24:36 AM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
I think it's a mistake.
I've just received a letter by email from the council confirming the refusal of planning permission.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Stokey Local" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
<document_ls24E5.pdf>
suzy r
May 10, 2013, 1:18:23 PM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Hi Kirsten,
that's weird I have just had a letter from Femi (head of Enforcement or planning)saying they have refused the first planning application..
Suzy
From: Kirsten Foster <kirstens...@gmail.com>
To: stoke...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:35
Subject: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
that's weird I have just had a letter from Femi (head of Enforcement or planning)saying they have refused the first planning application..
Suzy
From: Kirsten Foster <kirstens...@gmail.com>
To: stoke...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:35
Subject: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
Kirsten Foster
May 10, 2013, 3:29:05 PM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
The last application was rejected by the planning committee, but the developers have made a new application. It's not clear to me whether that means the process starts from the beginning (ie wide consultation and longer time for comments/objections etc) or what the opportunities for comments will be.
The developers can still also go to appeal.
Séan Donnellan
May 10, 2013, 5:01:01 PM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
I suspect the amended/new planning proposal triggered someone that they forgot to inform the original complainants of the council decision.
Weather the formal rejection changes the process - new submission / amended - I don't know. - Nick??
We're away on Saturday - but happy to help.
Séan
-------------------------
Got 5 minutes? - Check out Debora's blog: www.lickedspoon.co.uk
-------------------------
Séan Donnellan
112 Rectory Road
Stoke Newington,
London,
N16 7SD
Got 5 minutes? - Check out Debora's blog: www.lickedspoon.co.uk
-------------------------
Séan Donnellan
112 Rectory Road
Stoke Newington,
London,
N16 7SD
Kirsten Foster
May 11, 2013, 3:34:09 AM5/11/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Ok, I also got the letter about the planning committee rejection. Maybe the first one was just a mistake.
KirstenOn 10 May 2013 20:29, Kirsten Foster <kir...@kirstenfoster.com> wrote:
Nick Perry
May 10, 2013, 3:33:14 PM5/10/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
The new application has no connection to the previous application administratively so a brand new 21 day period for consultation will begin once the new application is validated and site notices posted, etc.
Comments from previous applications are not generally considered with new, revised applications.
However the previous conclusions of officers and committee are considered by the planners where they are relevant.
So in essence, we must write again about the merits or otherwise of the new scheme.
Nick
Nick Perry | LONDON N16, UK
suzy r
May 14, 2013, 8:40:51 AM5/14/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Hi Nick,
is there a limit on the amount of times they can apply...as it all costs so much in terms of planning/council time and takes up everyones time as well?
Suzy
From: Nick Perry <nick....@amulation.co.uk>
To: "stoke...@googlegroups.com" <stoke...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 20:33
Subject: Re: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
is there a limit on the amount of times they can apply...as it all costs so much in terms of planning/council time and takes up everyones time as well?
Suzy
From: Nick Perry <nick....@amulation.co.uk>
To: "stoke...@googlegroups.com" <stoke...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 20:33
Subject: Re: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
Tom Uprichard
May 14, 2013, 12:12:55 PM5/14/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Surely application 2012/2228 is the old one, dating
from August last year, that has been rejected.
Tom
Nick Perry
May 17, 2013, 7:09:15 AM5/17/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Not really. You can't put the same application in twice but you can mut as many different application in as you like, but at £35k a time in application fees to LBH, and all the associated professional fees, it's expensive for the applicant.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
Séan Donnellan
May 17, 2013, 7:32:34 AM5/17/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
Not as expensive as buying the land and not being able to build on it!
#giveitupgreg
Jane Holgate
May 17, 2013, 6:45:21 AM5/17/13
to stoke...@googlegroups.com
no
On 14/05/2013 13:40, suzy r wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> is there a limit on the amount of times they can apply...as it all
> costs so much in terms of planning/council time and takes up everyones
> time as well?
> Suzy
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Nick Perry <nick....@amulation.co.uk>
> *To:* "stoke...@googlegroups.com" <stoke...@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 10 May 2013, 20:33
> *Subject:* Re: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201
> *From:* Kirsten Foster <kirstens...@gmail.com
> <mailto:kirstens...@gmail.com>>
> *To:* stoke...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:stoke...@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:35
> *Subject:* [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201
> kir...@kirstenfoster.com <mailto:kir...@kirstenfoster.com>
On 14/05/2013 13:40, suzy r wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> is there a limit on the amount of times they can apply...as it all
> costs so much in terms of planning/council time and takes up everyones
> time as well?
> Suzy
>
>
> *From:* Nick Perry <nick....@amulation.co.uk>
> *To:* "stoke...@googlegroups.com" <stoke...@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 10 May 2013, 20:33
> *Subject:* Re: [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201
> Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
>
> The new application has no connection to the previous application
> administratively so a brand new 21 day period for consultation will
> begin once the new application is validated and site notices posted, etc.
>
> Comments from previous applications are not generally considered with
> new, revised applications.
>
> However the previous conclusions of officers and committee are
> considered by the planners where they are relevant.
>
> So in essence, we must write again about the merits or otherwise of
> the new scheme.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Kirsten Foster
> <kir...@kirstenfoster.com <mailto:kir...@kirstenfoster.com>> wrote:
>
> The last application was rejected by the planning committee, but
> the developers have made a new application. It's not clear to me
> whether that means the process starts from the beginning (ie wide
> consultation and longer time for comments/objections etc) or what
> the opportunities for comments will be.
>
> The developers can still also go to appeal.
>
> So still not sure why I was sent the letter I was!
>
>
>
>
> On 10 May 2013 18:18, suzy r <suzy...@yahoo.co.uk
>
> The new application has no connection to the previous application
> administratively so a brand new 21 day period for consultation will
> begin once the new application is validated and site notices posted, etc.
>
> Comments from previous applications are not generally considered with
> new, revised applications.
>
> However the previous conclusions of officers and committee are
> considered by the planners where they are relevant.
>
> So in essence, we must write again about the merits or otherwise of
> the new scheme.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Kirsten Foster
> <kir...@kirstenfoster.com <mailto:kir...@kirstenfoster.com>> wrote:
>
> The last application was rejected by the planning committee, but
> the developers have made a new application. It's not clear to me
> whether that means the process starts from the beginning (ie wide
> consultation and longer time for comments/objections etc) or what
> the opportunities for comments will be.
>
> The developers can still also go to appeal.
>
> So still not sure why I was sent the letter I was!
>
>
>
>
> On 10 May 2013 18:18, suzy r <suzy...@yahoo.co.uk
> <mailto:suzy...@yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi Kirsten,
> that's weird I have just had a letter from Femi (head of
> Enforcement or planning)saying they have refused the first
> planning application..
> Suzy
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Kirsten,
> that's weird I have just had a letter from Femi (head of
> Enforcement or planning)saying they have refused the first
> planning application..
> Suzy
>
>
> *From:* Kirsten Foster <kirstens...@gmail.com
> <mailto:kirstens...@gmail.com>>
> *To:* stoke...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:stoke...@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:35
> *Subject:* [Stokey Local] Fwd: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201
> Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
>
> I've just received a letter thanking me for my comments on the
> Wilmer Pl application and duplicating the previous letters
> about this saying I'd be notified if it went to committee etc.
> (see attached - let me know if it doesn't come through)
>
> I haven't (obviously) submitted any comment on the new plans
> submitted, so is this a mistake?!
>
> Or are they just assuming our previous comments and objections
> are carried forward for the new application?
>
> Kirsten
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk
> <mailto:noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk>>
> Date: 10 May 2013 15:23
> Subject: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High
> Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
> To: kirstens...@gmail.com
> <mailto:kirstens...@gmail.com>
>
>
> You have received this email from Hackney Council (Planning
> Service) in relation to a planning matter at Land at Wilmer
> Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH.
>
>
>
> The attached correspondence contains important information;
> please retain it for your records.
>
>
>
> If you would like to respond, please reply to
> plan...@hackney.gov.uk <mailto:plan...@hackney.gov.uk>.
>
> I've just received a letter thanking me for my comments on the
> Wilmer Pl application and duplicating the previous letters
> about this saying I'd be notified if it went to committee etc.
> (see attached - let me know if it doesn't come through)
>
> I haven't (obviously) submitted any comment on the new plans
> submitted, so is this a mistake?!
>
> Or are they just assuming our previous comments and objections
> are carried forward for the new application?
>
> Kirsten
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk
> <mailto:noreply-...@hackney.gov.uk>>
> Date: 10 May 2013 15:23
> Subject: Land at Wilmer Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High
> Street London N16 0LH - 2012/2228
> To: kirstens...@gmail.com
> <mailto:kirstens...@gmail.com>
>
>
> You have received this email from Hackney Council (Planning
> Service) in relation to a planning matter at Land at Wilmer
> Place 193 - 201 Stoke Newington High Street London N16 0LH.
>
>
>
> The attached correspondence contains important information;
> please retain it for your records.
>
>
>
> If you would like to respond, please reply to
>
>
>
> In any correspondence, please quote the Council reference
> number, which is included in the attached letter.
>
>
>
> If you have received this email in error, please forward it to
> plan...@hackney.gov.uk <mailto:plan...@hackney.gov.uk>.
>
>
> In any correspondence, please quote the Council reference
> number, which is included in the attached letter.
>
>
>
> If you have received this email in error, please forward it to
>
>
>
> If you cannot open the attachment you can download the
> following software free of charge:
>
> - Microsoft Word Viewer for Word attachments.
>
> - Adobe Reader for PDF attachments.
>
> Hackney Council may exercise its right to intercept any
> communication, the only exception to this would be
> confidential survey data, with any employee or agent of the
> Council using its telephony or data networks.
> By using these networks you give your consent to Hackney
> Council monitoring and recording your communication.
> If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it
> immediately and contact the sender.
> For further information about Hackney Council policies please
> contact Hackney Service Centre on: 020 8356 3000
>
>
>
> --
> Kirsten Foster
> kirstens...@gmail.com <mailto:kirstens...@gmail.com>
>
>
> If you cannot open the attachment you can download the
> following software free of charge:
>
> - Microsoft Word Viewer for Word attachments.
>
> - Adobe Reader for PDF attachments.
>
> Hackney Council may exercise its right to intercept any
> communication, the only exception to this would be
> confidential survey data, with any employee or agent of the
> Council using its telephony or data networks.
> By using these networks you give your consent to Hackney
> Council monitoring and recording your communication.
> If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it
> immediately and contact the sender.
> For further information about Hackney Council policies please
> contact Hackney Service Centre on: 020 8356 3000
>
>
>
> --
> Kirsten Foster
> +44 (0)7553092688
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:stokeylocal%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:stokeylocal%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> kir...@kirstenfoster.com <mailto:kir...@kirstenfoster.com>
> +44 (0)7553092688
> +44 (0)207 682 3153
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:stokeylocal%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> +44 (0)207 682 3153
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nick Perry | LONDON N16, UK
> http://pez.im/ | nick....@amulation.co.uk
> <mailto:nick....@amulation.co.uk>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nick Perry | LONDON N16, UK
> http://pez.im/ | nick....@amulation.co.uk
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Stokey Local" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to stokeylocal...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages