small update
0 views
Skip to first unread message
h.we...@uvt.nl
Aug 27, 2008, 10:45:47 AM8/27/08
to Stockholm Meeting Aug 2008
I just added a new version of the ontology that includes an attempt
towards a summary (with at least repetition of REA as possible).
Furthermore, I have changed the 3b a bit; the notion of "port" fits
well with e3value, but less with ws-choreography (where a port groups
several actions rather
than one), REA or openedi. So I have skipped this part again and
suggest that we keep close to REA and see the exchange event as the
fulfilment of a commitment, and brought about by a business event -
part of a business transaction. The relationship business event-
exchange event is a bit implicit in the REA BOV such as described in
the ISO/IEC document, but I think it is right.
One question raised is the relationship between business transaction
and real process.The real process orchestrates services, but it also
somehow has an (external) interface.
Hans
towards a summary (with at least repetition of REA as possible).
Furthermore, I have changed the 3b a bit; the notion of "port" fits
well with e3value, but less with ws-choreography (where a port groups
several actions rather
than one), REA or openedi. So I have skipped this part again and
suggest that we keep close to REA and see the exchange event as the
fulfilment of a commitment, and brought about by a business event -
part of a business transaction. The relationship business event-
exchange event is a bit implicit in the REA BOV such as described in
the ISO/IEC document, but I think it is right.
One question raised is the relationship between business transaction
and real process.The real process orchestrates services, but it also
somehow has an (external) interface.
Hans
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages