RFC: Sensible name for flash/flash

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Uwe Bonnes

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 5:28:23 AM2/7/12
to stm3...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

Other
(http://www.mikrocontroller.net/articles/STM32F4-Discovery#stlink(german))
and I feel that "flash" is a name too genuine. In the article above, st-flash
is used. Any other ideas/wishes?

Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes b...@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

lementec fabien

unread,
Feb 7, 2012, 12:19:02 PM2/7/12
to stm3...@googlegroups.com
I agree :)

Karl P

unread,
Feb 8, 2012, 11:53:36 PM2/8/12
to stm3...@googlegroups.com

I'd actually thought about adding the read/write options as just different
paramters to st-util. Finish adding getopt stuff, and add more to the help output.

stflash or even tflash (texane flash, also the t-prefix isn't very common in
projects these days, so it is good for tab-complete :)

on irc a few months ago some of the proposals were, (from memory)

slinky
stinky
stinkylinky
stflash
the_tool_formerly_known_as_stlink

Those were proposals for the project though, rather than just the flash tool.

Cheers,
Karl P

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages