Why Liberals-Progressives Became Racists

[What Democracy Means To Liberals]

Since the fall of communism this discredited secular pseudo-
religion has merely mutated and repackaged itself invading many
other secular/liberal causes like a virus. All forms of
socialism/Marxism must have a victim class and an exploiter
class in order to grow and organize. The cultural divide between
the conservative white majority versus leftwing white minority
means that minority must seek non-whites to build its power
base. Class warfare doesn't sell, but racism does.

In Hillary Clinton's 1969 thesis 'There is only the
fight...Analysis of the Alinsky Model' she notes of Alinsky's
tactics: "Some of his critics compare his tactics with those of
various hate groups such as lynch mobs..." (P13) Alinsky never
denied this, but his tactics were seen from the point of
empowering people on the bottom.

Leftists today under various names such as liberal or
progressive have no intention of empowering those on the bottom
whatever their race or color, but to secure expanded state power
at the top for themselves. 80 percent of the whites in America
oppose their agenda so they have to build a power base
elsewhere. Alinsky and his ilk provides the answer.

First is the idea of identity politics and leftists in
particular zero in on sex, gender, and in particular race in
order 'to rub raw the resentments of the people' though inciting
conflict, envy, and resentment. Race has replaced class.

As Mrs. Clinton notes, "in addition to aiding in the formation
of identity, conflict between social groups plays a creative
role by providing a process through which diverse interests are
adjusted." In other words people whose only identify is within
their own narrow racial or social group can be more easily
manipulated and controlled.

This is why the Democratic Party follows economic and social
policies that have destroyed the black family, while getting 90
percent of their vote year after year. The big craze now is
Hispanics as the next legion of useful idiots mostly voting for
the Leftists.

Mass immigration has pushed blacks out of the workforce into
poverty, has kept many poor Hispanics poor, thus allowing
liberals to focus the rage and resentment against the white
majority who opposed this economic genocide to begin with. By
focusing on race instead of class they give themselves, as a
very affluent class, political cover.

Seeing 'conflict as the route to power' they have to unite these
legions of social malcontents and racial economic losers to
focus on a common enemy and that enemy is the conservative
Christian white majority they themselves so hate. In other words
they promote anti-white racism as a way to unite their non-white
useful idiot racial identity groups to expand their power. This
nonsense is so engrained as to becoming almost a religion.

But as Mrs. Clinton noted in her thesis this kind of hate
mongering could spill out into open violence if control is lost.
That is why the Left (Democrats) are so adamant for more social
programs and government spending. Blacks for example while low
academic achievers are heavily dependant on government jobs.

Almost 25 percent of postal workers are black while almost one-
quarter of the black middle class depends on government jobs
according to The New York Times. Public housing and welfare are
heavily loaded towards minorities. Protecting large social
programs, income redistribution, and affirmative action racism
is as vital to holding their racial coalition intact as is their
spewing endless anti-white racism.

Noting that all forms of fascism is socialism in economic terms,
Progressivism-liberalism today has become a form of reverse
racial socialism or reverse Nazism. Instead of the majority
singling out and attacking a minority, we have a socialist led
minority coalition seeking to destroy the majority. They use the
same rhetoric once used against the Jews rife with conspiracy
theories or blaming every self-inflicted failure or bit of bad
luck on someone else.

A Religion of State
Wikipedia defines pseudo-religion (or pseudo theology) as "a
generally pejorative term applied to a non-mainstream belief
system or philosophy which is functionally similar to religious
practices..." Marxism in its various forms have led to the
deaths of over 100 million people in the 20th century and is
clearly the most deadly belief system ever invented. It's almost
a fundamentalist religion to its followers that need a cause in
their atheist lives. It's an irrational utopianism nightmare.

The center theme in Leftism's pseudo-religious diatribe is
'equality' (social justice) at any price. This is total nonsense
because in the real world people have differing abilities which
leads to differing outcomes. Technology changes are the main
reasons for income disparity, not racism. The only way to
achieve true 'social justice' is through force. It's another
failed religion that will never work outside the barrel of a gun.

Leftism's roots are in the French Revolution and the Jacobins,
the first modern example of a secular government committing
state-sanctioned murder. to quote Mrs. Clinton, ...the strongest
strains in modern radicalism is the eighteenth century
Enlightenment's faith in human reason and the possible
perfectibility of man...

There is also the influence of the industrial revolution,
technology, etc. The Enlightenment was atheistic and rejected
any notion of God except in the most abstract and remote sense.
The state becomes the ultimate power and even becomes god itself
often headed by a messiah figurehead. Examples are Napoleon,
Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, FDR, Kennedy, Obama, etc. This in no way
means President Obama is a Hitler or Stalin, but to some these
figures can have a Christ like awe.

Think back to Soviet Russia when the icons of the Saints were
replaced by the icons of the Russian Revolution. Or think back
to the pictures of Mussolini or Hitler in every office and on
every street corner. I know people that still have pictures
revering Kennedy, FDR, or even Ronald Reagan by the political
right. Don't forget Hitler and Mussolini were elected to office
while FDR was a in many respects was a fascist jailing thousands
over his economic policies (including one man for growing his
own wheat) and sending Japanese Americans to concentration camps.

FDR socialist style central planning caused the near starvation
of millions of Americans by ordering the destruction of crops to
artificially boost farm prices. Following the war socialism of
Woodrow Wilson FDR wanted a war with Japan that he instigated by
cutting off Japan's access to oil and raw materials. That
doesn't even count attempting to overthrow the Constitution by
packing the Supreme Court, etc. While he might have been
popular, he was still a racist, anti-Semite, and fascist tyrant
regardless of his goals.

All of these god-men sought to perfect society as they saw it,
society representing the masses-people. This 'perfectibility of
man' leaves no room for the individual and certainly not
individual liberty.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau invented the term "the general will"
referring to the desire or interest of a people as a whole and
often "associated with socialist traditions in politics."
Rousseau was somewhat a mystic and this idea is ill defined, but
have no doubt the welfare of the individual is subordinate to
the "will" of the masses.

One would do well to study Rousseau because he is everywhere
around us. In his The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality to
quote, "that human beings are basically good by nature, but were
corrupted by the complex historical events that resulted in
present day civil society." Thus the secular "Original Sin" is
the fault of society in general, not human weakness. Society is
broke and must be "fixed."

Rousseau was the father of the bloody French Revolution and
Marxism.

See Left vs Right, Montesquieu, Corporatism

H.G. Wells coined the term "liberal fascists." To quote Wells in
a speech given to the Young Liberals at Oxford in 1932,
"Progressives must become liberal fascists and enlightened
Nazis." This is what we have today. H.G. Wells was a Fabian
socialist.

This is the nonsense that fills the minds of those in our elite
colleges. And fascism and socialism are really the much same
thing in practical terms differing only in culture from country
to country. Nazi means National Socialist German Worker' party
and Mussolini was a former communist and staunch atheist.
Mussolini was not a racist or anti-Semite like Hitler or the
milder version of FDR.

Our form today is milder, preferring to "remake" society by
destroying it from the inside. They invent new "rights" creating
a myriad of laws and government regulations to secure them then
strip citizens of their most fundamental rights in the process.
In the Declaration of Independence the Founders believed our
rights derive from God while the secular-leftist god state
determines what your right are and revoke them at any time. Who
needs firing squads and gulags when they have the "enlightened"
use of the IRS and the courts o ruin anyone?

So we have a situation where Leftism, in particular in America,
simply doesn't appeal to thinking white people. There is a great
deal of indoctrination in universities and the professional
ranks such as education, law, etc. they fill. These are the only
large number of whites they can attract. They need the support
of the 'downtrodden' to win power. The New York Times article
"The Future of the Obama Coalition" November 27, 2011 points
this out:

For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly
severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic
operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first
time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working
class...The 2012 approach treats white voters without college
degrees as an unattainable cohort...
Further:

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working
class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a
center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who
have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment -
professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources
managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and
therapists - and a second, substantial constituency of lower-
income voters who are disproportionately African-American and
Hispanic.
This wealthy, left-wing professional class to get and hold power
must gain the support of those whose economic interests and
often conservative family values they are directly at odds with.
So they resort to the "race card" and target working-class
whites and conservative whites as the cause of the their
problems. Give us your vote and through "redistributive change"
we will make the world a better place and hand out some of that
"Obama money".

So modern Progressivism or liberal fascism is a type of pseudo-
religion to its followers with the state as god headed by some
messiah figure. To these "useful idiots," these beliefs are
articles of a secular fundamentalist' faith. If the "faith" can
preached loud enough, long enough, and they can silence the
skeptics, then the faith must be the truth.

The new Progressive-liberal trinity of diversity,
multiculturalism, and affirmative action is the center of their
'social justice' dogma. They make the Religious Right look like
atheists and like all fundamentalists are tyrants.

http://www.sullivan-county.com/id5/marxism_racism.htm