Hi all,
in a study, we are interested in colour-feeling associations. For the study, participants were given 15 feelings (angry, furious, passionate etc.) and they had to select a colour from a set of 27 colour shades for each feeling.
This is the result, the 27 colour shades were collapsed into 14 broader colour terms.
black | blue | brown | colour.not.listed | green | grey | no.association | orange | pink | purple | red | tile | white | yellow | |
angry | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
bored | 1 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
calm | 0 | 40 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 2 |
cheerful | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50 |
confident | 5 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
depressed | 28 | 27 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
excited | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 21 |
fearful | 19 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
furious | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
happy | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 46 |
jealous | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 47 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
joyful | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 43 |
passionate | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
sad | 3 | 54 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
shy | 2 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 2 |
For the results, we are interested in which associations are particularly strong.
My initial idea was to perform a chisquare test on the contingency table, and to plot the residuals to show which associations are significant and which ones are repelled.
However, there are many zeros in the contingency table which means that a chisquare test should not be performed.
If I perform a fisher test, I get the following error message:
“Error in fisher.test(english) : FEXACT error 5.
The hash table key cannot be computed because the largest key
is larger than the largest representable int.
The algorithm cannot proceed.
Reduce the workspace size or use another algorithm.”
Irrespective of the fisher test, in order to get at the residuals to compute strength of association, I have to perform the chisquare test. But again, I am not sure whether I can do this, given all the zeros in my contingency table.
Shall I refrain from analysing the residuals and look at percentages instead?
Thanks for your help!
Best,
Nina
Hi all,
I posting this (with Stefan's approval, of course) because The School of Languages and Cultures at The University of Queensland (UQ) is advertising a research assistant position in computational linguistics and/or corpus linguistics with a focus on quantitative analysis in R.
The job advertisement can be found here: https://linguistlist.org/issues/30/30-3484.html
I think that the position is a great opportunity for early career researchers to further develop their skills in computational approaches to analyzing language data, to gain experience about what it is like to work in an English-speaking country at a research-intensive university in a truly beautiful city (this only applies to those that do not already do so obviously).
UQ ranks in the top 50 as measured by the Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities. The University also ranks 48 in the QS World University Rankings, 45 in the US News Best Global Universities Rankings, 65 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings and 55 in the Academic Ranking of World Universities.
Kind regards
Martin