Re: Digest for state-trauma-registry-programs-usergroup@googlegroups.com - 3 Messages in 1 Topic

67 views
Skip to first unread message

Cramer, John - EMS

unread,
Oct 13, 2012, 11:10:08 PM10/13/12
to state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ashley,

In Idaho we use ImageTrend for both (Rescue Bridge and Patient Registry).

The Trauma Registry staff are very happy with the integration.

Salud!

John Cramer

Please excuse any mistypes and creative auto corrections by my phone.


state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com wrote:

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/state-trauma-registry-programs-usergroup/topics

    Ashley Robertson Newmyer <alrober...@gmail.com> Oct 12 11:54AM -0500  

    Hello all,
     
    Do any of you have data collection systems in your state that integrate
    both Trauma Registry and EMS data collection? If you could send me the
    vendor name I would really appreciate it.
     
    Thank you!
     
    Ashley Newmyer, MPH, CPH
    State Trauma Registrar
    Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services

     

    "Bowlus, Ambrosia D (HSS)" <ambrosi...@alaska.gov> Oct 12 05:30PM  

    Digital Innovations has a connection. Alaska will be upgrading to use this linkage in the future through the Collector Web Registry Product.
    But it does not cover both systems, it allows there to be a linkage between EMS and TR data.
    I would ask them for more details.
    Thanks
    Ambrosia
     
    From: state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com [mailto:state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ashley Robertson Newmyer
    Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:55 AM
    To: state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com
    Subject: Integrated Trauma Registry and EMS Data Collection Systems
     
    Hello all,
     
    Do any of you have data collection systems in your state that integrate both Trauma Registry and EMS data collection? If you could send me the vendor name I would really appreciate it.
     
    Thank you!
     
    Ashley Newmyer, MPH, CPH
    State Trauma Registrar
    Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services

     

    Robert Walker <rwalker...@gmail.com> Oct 12 01:41PM -0500  

    Good afternoon Ashley, I believe TraumaBase can be configured to interface
    with other databases. It is published by Clinical Data Management,
    303-670-3331.
     
    Best of luck to you, Robert
     
    On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Ashley Robertson Newmyer <
     
    --
    Robert J. Walker, CAISS, CSTR
    Contract Abstractor and Trauma Registry Consultant
    rwalker...@gmail.com
    (970) 623-6579

     

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group state-trauma-registry-programs-usergroup.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

Notice: This e-mail, including attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it.  Thank you.

 

John F Kutcher

unread,
Oct 14, 2012, 10:23:20 AM10/14/12
to state-trauma-registr...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ashley / All --

Another aspect to keep in mind is "Interoperability" -- i.e., the ability to "connect" multiple Trauma and EMS vendor products.   "Single vendor" solutions for Trauma and EMS do exist, and these can be provided by vendors that provide both Trauma and offerings (such as Digital Innovation, Lancet, ImageTrend).  However, often, especially in a State setting, there will be multiple ePCR products that could be in use locally with EMS agencies -- and multiple Trauma Registry products that could be in use locally at trauma centers.  "Connecting" all of these together provides the most complete solution, since it is nearly often impractical to have every trauma center or every EMS agency adopt whatever system(s) a given State puts in place.

So the best results can come from a combination of "integrated" offerings and "interoperability" solutions.  Some examples:
  • In Kansas, there is a connection between local installations of DI Collector at the KS trauma centers with the ImageTrend EMS system in Kansas, called KEMSIS
  • In North Carolina, there is a connection between local installation of NTRACS at NC centers with the state EMS system in North Carolina, called PreMIS

"Interoperable" solutions have the benefit of allowing ePCR information to reach the existing local trauma registries installed at major trauma centers.  The technology and data exchange standards exist to allow Registrars to electronically lookup, link, and auto-fill ePCR/EMS information into their trauma registry pre-hospital data sections.  The resulting information is then "linked", so when trauma registry data is centralized at a state, the linkage exists between trauma records and EMS records.  This allows the critical "outcome data" loop to be completed, since hospital outcome data can be tied back to the relevant ePCR's.

The product that Digital Innovation provides to "connect" multiple systems together is called the Continuum of Care Server (CCS).  The CCS is used in the KS and NC examples above, to name a few.  The CCS has "adapters" that can allow it to be connected to any NEMSIS EMS system and to a trauma registry system.  CCS adapters have been implemented with multiple EMS products (such as ImageTrend, emsCharts) and multiple Trauma products (such as Collector, NTRACS), to enable integration of data.  New adapters can be developed as needed with any interested products and vendors.

So, bottom line.  As one formulates a vision of an "Integrated Trauma and EMS Solution" it is also a good idea to broaden the meaning of "integrated" to include not only the users of a centralized web-based solution, but also the many local installations of EMS agency software and trauma registry software.  National standards and technology advancements have enabled this new breed of integrated solutions - that allows all of these independent solutions to be tied together.  This is important for a State, since putting in a single vendor solution, regardless of Vendor, still leaves open the "interoperability" question for agencies and hospitals who have existing solutions with which they likely will continue to need and use.

Best Regards, John

Notice: This e-mail, including attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?? 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it.  Thank you.

 


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages