This article is full of generalizations which are not based on
statistical analysis of historic facts. Also in this article certain
key words like "nation/race", "culture", "religion=law", "leadership"
used loosely. The article sounds like a jumble of United Nation
Charter which is good for nothing to result real action, begging
guidance from politicians;->
The writer of the article cannot point out what is wrong with the
existing dominant socio-politico-economic (SPE) system, perhaps
because of his lack of being in command of political concepts and
problems o four times.
The writer of the article ignores the importance of "law" and
"constitution" in the existing SPE structure and cannot see
similarities in that structure in existing nation oriented states.
Aslo he is not aware that this "nation state" is a half cooked concept
of late French Revolution which is prepared bloody grounds for two
World Wars and laying the foundation to the Third. He ignores all
those facts and knit picks September 11 and conflict between Israelis
and Palestinians stamping them as "religious conflict" for he doesn't
know that "religion" means "laws" as well as some rituals build around
them. In that sense the writer is unaware that modern SPE structures
are being based on laws are the religious structures themselves. It is
obvious distortion to take Israeli and Palestinian conflict as laws
(religion) related while ignoring the US and EU attacks to Iraq and
Afghanistan as non-law (non-religion) related.
But than I don't blame the writer on that because this is the Language
of modern secularo-fascist SPE structures. Those structures fight for
one thing - a mono-law to assimilate all to eliminate multiplicity
among nations to singularity. They tried this during the last two wars
and they will keep on trying it if human beings do not dismiss them,
stop them as monolithic, number one enemy of human-beings by using
intellect.