OK. I've thought about it a little, and let's include the volume
divisions, as well as their subdivisions.
Most of our poetry omnibuses are of poets who did sometimes publish
volumes but without interesting subdivisions. We also have James Joyce's
poetry omnibus which did keep the volume subdivisions, because one of
the volumes had the poems numbered in a specific order, and because both
volumes were extremely short.
I think the argument for how previous scholarly editions did it also
weighs a lot. Most/all kept the divisions, so we can too.
As always, if we change our mind later on it's not a big deal to go in
and remove the divisions.
We should arrange them in by date published, so the volumes will likely
have some uncollected poems sandwiched inbetween.
Since we already have North of Boston and New Hampshire, you can just
ingest those ebooks wholesale. Once this omnibus is released we'll
remove them from the corpus. You could also reuse that cover art of New
Hampshire if you want. (North of Boston's cover art PD proof was lost
when we transitioned to the artwork DB so I would prefer not to re-use it.)
On 9/15/25 10:46 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi everyone, thanks for all the feedback. I'll share some of the reasons
> why I wanted to keep the collections as section in the omnibus (FYI, /
> AHS/ is shorthand for the book /Robert Frost Among His Poems/ found here
> <
https://archive.org/details/robertfrostamong0000cram>):
>
> - Precedent: While it is true that Frost didn't necessarily keep the
> content of each collection consistent across different releases, the
> actual divisions have been kept around for most (if not all) modern
> collections of Frost's poetry. The main ones today are /The Poetry of
> Robert Frost (1979)/ and the Library of America collection from 1995.
> Both of these follow the format of /Complete Poems (1949)/ maintaining
> the individual collection divisions. The ones that didn't follow this,
> like /Selected Poems (1923),/ often were smaller mix-and-match
> recompilations rather than complete collections. Additionally, a lot of
> the more academic work around Frost's poems I've come across also follow
> the the 1949 collection format, like the book I used to collect
> information for the unreleased/uncollected poems /(AHS)./
> /
> /
> - Structure: From these first five collections, the poems /New
> Hampshire/ and /West Running Brook/ were divided into different sections
> each. Honestly, I'm not sure how much these actually mattered to Frost
> since they were dropped for /Collected Poems (1930)/ and later releases
> with the same name, but at least for some of his later work like /A
> Further Range, A Witness Tree, /and /Steeple Bush /he did maintain the
> subdivisions for each collection when collected. I think it'd be good to
> keep these subdivisions if there was some intended meaning grouping
> together certain poems.
>
> - Convenience: Not necessarily the best reason, but on my end keeping
> the poems within their respective collections lowers the amount of poems
> I need to keep track of for release order. I previously prepared this
> spreadsheet here <
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/
> d/1JeHkWIAgTwpZYZ97-CyTzjCqIU1_YUgnXezTrdDchio/edit?usp=drive_link> that
> kept track of Frost's poems that were individually released in
> magazines/books (and honestly almost dropped this project due to how
> dull it was to transcribe). However, the book I used for this
> information was a fairly old bibliography on Frost from 1937 and there
> are definitely a few poems that are missing or incorrect in that sheet.
> I would need to remake the sheet using /AHS/ (or a Frost encyclopedia I
> own) and go over every single poem in all collections to separate those
> released in magazines and those released as part of the collection. I
> would also probably need to double check this information since I've
> found a couple of errors at least in the uncollected poems section
> (granted minor, like the incorrect page or date listed for where to find
> a particular poem). A big amount of work for me, unfortunately.
>
> /-/ Sorting: This is partially related to the last point. A majority of
> Frost's poems were released for the first time in his book collections
> rather than published independently in a magazine. This trend increased
> in later years where most poems were exclusively released in collections
> rather than magazines. This has probably come up before, but I found it
> a bit awkward to have poems published at specific dates in order and
> then have a huge chunk of poems from a single collection either
> alphabetically or somewhat following the order they were originally
> arranged as with gaps in the middle.
>
> - Historical Relevance: This is another point that also shouldn't
> necessarily weigh in much for this discussion, but I'll include it for
> reference. The 1930 edition of /Collected Poems/ is the second book that
> Frost received a Pulitzer prize for (the first one being for /New
> Hampshire/). This collection, if we kept the subdivisions, would more-
> or-less imitate the format of this release (at least for around six
> years until we can add /A Further Range/ to the collection).
>
> But of course, I leave the final decision up to project leadership. It
> would probably take me a while to put together a new documents with all
> independently-released poems, so if that's what's decided I won't be
> able to start working on this collection for a while.
>
> Best,
> Alex (Sasha)
> On Monday, September 15, 2025 at 1:58:48 PM UTC-7 Emma Sweeney wrote:
>
> I'm in favor of having them all in a single collection file
> <
https://standardebooks.org/contribute/how-tos/how-to-structure-and-
> style-large-poetic-productions#a-single-collections-file> in
> standardebooks/ <
https://groups.google.com/g/standardebooks/>
> > c/FHhmBKi0iSY/m/MAAE4JWABgAJ> thread. I'm using a new
> account, so for
> > reference I previously worked on /Demian/ by Herman Hesse.
> >
> > In summary, I want to make a single Robert Frost poetry
> omnibus with all
> > his work published before 1930. The bulk of the content would
> be Frost's
> > five main collections published before that year:
> >
> > - /A Boy's Will/ (1913) (scans <https://
>
catalog.hathitrust.org/ <
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/>
>
catalog.hathitrust.org/ <
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/>
> boston <
https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/robert-frost/north-of-
> boston>>)
> > - /Mountain Interval/ (1916) (scans <https://
>
catalog.hathitrust.org/ <
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/>
>
catalog.hathitrust.org/ <
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/>
>
catalog.hathitrust.org/ <
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/>
> showbook.php <
https://www.fadedpage.com/showbook.php>?
> > pid=20141056>)
> >
> > Each collection (as they were originally released) would be a
> section/
> > chapter of omnibus. An additional section would contain all
> uncollected
> > poetry that wasn't included in any of these. And for the sake of
> > simplifying the work maintaining the project, poems that are
> in the
> > public domain but were included in later collections will not be
> > included in this section. Instead, they'll be included once
> the entire
> > collection enters the public domain.
> >
> > I've documentec Frost's uncollected/unreleased poems in this
> <https://
> >
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/ <
http://docs.google.com/
> spreadsheets/>
> > d/10YndlKkmU3LKGboOMwcPu676Q4FqzZYu174taKiDTgA/edit?
> d/527685060 <
http://www.biblio.com/book/locked-out-forge-number-
> two-frost/d/527685060>>)
> > - "The Same Leaves" (1926) (link <https://
>
hdl.handle.net/2027/ <
https://hdl.handle.net/2027/>
> > mdp.39015069757287?
> urlappend=%3Bseq=374%3Bownerid=13510798900888071-336>)
> > - "The Walker" (1928) (link <
https://archive.org/details/
> <
https://archive.org/details/>
> > secondamericanca029966mbp/page/70/mode/2up>, later renamed
> "The Egg and
> > the Machine")
> > - "The Lovely Shall be Choosers" (1929) (link <https://
> >
hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b4110177 <
http://hdl.handle.net/2027/
> uc1.b4110177>?
> > urlappend=%3Bseq=60%3Bownerid=9007199271773507-64>)
> >
> > Do note that the scan for "Locked Out" is not exactly
> official, so a
> > better one is likely needed. If one can't be found, this poem
> can be
> > omitted for now and be added next year using scans of /
> Collected Poems./
> > /
> > /
> > Side Note: I've moved the spreadsheets/scans from my previous
> account to
> > this one, so the spreadsheet links in my previous post will
> likely stop
> > working in the future.
> >
> > (Also, you can call me Sasha or Alexander to avoid confusion)
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> > Groups "Standard Ebooks" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send
> > an email to
standardebook...@googlegroups.com
> > <mailto:
standardebook...@googlegroups.com>.
> > To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/ <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/>
> > standardebooks/7d138b71-386a-40ca-
> a809-1c726457b46an%
40googlegroups.com <
http://40googlegroups.com>
> > <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/
> standardebooks/7d138b71-386a-40ca- <
https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/standardebooks/7d138b71-386a-40ca->
> > a809-1c726457b46an%
40googlegroups.com?
> utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer <
http://40googlegroups.com?
> utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>>.
> standardebooks/d8695d0a-9ea7-4bf2-8c32-927efea0141fn%
40googlegroups.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/standardebooks/
> d8695d0a-9ea7-4bf2-8c32-927efea0141fn%
40googlegroups.com?
> utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.