OK. We should probably just stick with the 1907 text, though that is
interesting information that you could put in the long description.
On 9/18/21 2:34 PM, Vince wrote:
> I’m going to work on this next.
>
> There are two versions in PG, one fairly early (233), and one later
> (5267). The later one matches the later scans of the novel, so it’s the
> one I’m going to use. The differences are minimal, mostly centered
> around a few lines in a paragraph in the first chapter (which Dreiser
> apparently revised between the 1900 Doubleday edition that didn’t sell
> and the 1907 edition that all subsequent editions have followed), and a
> few places where dialog is started as separate paragraphs.
>
> The larger text differences I alluded to in my other message are out of
> scope. Apparently, a large chunk of material (36K words, almost 20% of
> the total) was cut from the novel very early on. There’s debate about
> the why’s and wherefore’s, but what’s universally acknowledged is that
> Dreiser approved the cuts. However, the “cleanup” after the cuts either
> wasn’t done at all or was poorly done, and so there are some
> inconsistencies in the “standard” text. You can read more about it in
> this article <
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27746376> on JSTOR. The
> so-called “Pennsylvania text” was (is?) quite controversial. Almost all
> modern editions of the novel still use the 1907 text.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Standard Ebooks" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
standardebook...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
standardebook...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/standardebooks/5E013D68-FF45-4C9F-9234-0C2C61EF43A9%40letterboxes.org
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/standardebooks/5E013D68-FF45-4C9F-9234-0C2C61EF43A9%40letterboxes.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.