and we can cut them. Reflecting on the commentary you included for the
> description the next two sentences describe:
>
> One of these is supposed to represent a New York Skyscraper in the
> shape of a Pyramid, the other is a dancing group under which is
> written: “The Stockbrokers and the Dervishes.” And around these
> symbols, in Arabic circlewise, these words:––“And this is my Book,
> the Book of Khalid, which I dedicate to my Brother Man, my Mother
> Nature, and my Maker God.”
>
>
> So, it describes images that don’t exist, thus the images in the book
> have nothing to do with the introduction’s images, and the images in the
> book aren’t referred to in the book, making them decorative.
>
> But yes, I defer to Alex as well.
>
>
>> On May 28, 2026, at 2:55 PM, 'Weijia Cheng' via Standard Ebooks
>> <
standar...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> While from what I can tell, the book never explicitly refers to the
>> illustrations, the fictional introduction does say "The present Editor
>> was attracted to it by the dedication and the rough drawings on the
>> cover; which, indeed, are as curious, if not as mystical, as ancient
>> Egyptian symbols." The introduction refers to images that don't
>> actually appear in the book, but I think it suggests that the images
>> are part of the literary conceit (this is a found manuscript
>> containing illustrations). But I will defer to whatever Alex ends up
>> deciding.
>>
>> On Thursday, May 28, 2026 at 3:24:52 PM UTC-4 Vince wrote:
>>
>> I read the first two epigraphs, and I don’t see anything in them
>> decorative and therefore cuttable. But I think that’s probably
>> an Alex-level decision. :)
>>
>>
>>> On May 28, 2026, at 1:35 PM, 'Weijia Cheng' via Standard Ebooks
>>> <
standar...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright, and is that a go-ahead on keeping the illustrations?
>