C++11 thread

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Daniel Lee

unread,
Aug 14, 2014, 11:35:49 AM8/14/14
to stan...@googlegroups.com
[renamed subject]

Thanks. I'm going to start a wiki page of all the things we could really take advantage of in C++11 (or Ben, you can start it since you've got the best handle on it).

Unfortunately, I thought we weren't close to running with C++11 yet.




On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Ben Goodrich <goodri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:26:49 AM UTC-4, Daniel Lee wrote:
I don't think I have an answer that I'm comfortable with.

Me either, but take a look at http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/fenv/FE_exceptions in the C++11 standard. Basically, if you set that up, it watches for bad numerical things that happen.

Ben

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "stan development mailing list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to stan-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Ben Goodrich

unread,
Aug 14, 2014, 11:56:50 AM8/14/14
to stan...@googlegroups.com
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:35:49 AM UTC-4, Daniel Lee wrote:
[renamed subject]

Thanks. I'm going to start a wiki page of all the things we could really take advantage of in C++11 (or Ben, you can start it since you've got the best handle on it).

Unfortunately, I thought we weren't close to running with C++11 yet.

We are as close as we decide to be. I think the FE_* stuff is in g++-4.6, even though most C++11 stuff isn't.

Ben


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages