Pirates Of The Caribbean Licky Licky

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lorri Dent

unread,
Jul 24, 2024, 8:55:23 PM7/24/24
to stalrollwaspa

The former WICB president has a few clarifying questions for embattled President Dave Cameron

Did he give any instructions to Lloyd re team selection for South Africa; and if not, is Lloyd acting outside of his authority?
If you are currently paid by the Board as an Executive President, are you aware that those payments are ultra vires because they are not provided for in the Constitution and may have to be refunded?

pirates of the caribbean licky licky


Download File ☆☆☆ https://cinurl.com/2zLUgY



Let us be honest who cares that Bravo and Pollard etc have been excluded from the team? They have under performed for the last 10 years averaging around 20-25. Why not start fresh with hungry youngsters? Are we just statisfied on being the whipping boys of cricket? I remember when Pollard first came on the seen he would come out to bat and some of our own supporters would Boo him. It was embarassing at the time,today this man has not shown that he was better than that. Are we fooled by the entertainment factor. We are capable of better? Please lets us move on.

We have all said at sometime that Lloyd was our best captian. He is the head of selectors we question his judgement. Who do you support West Indies of individuals?

In reply to Domic

Bravo was on the ICC ODI team of the year
Every country that applies for his services is wrong
The ICC are wrong
A few petty West Indians are right

Hungry youngsters??!
Where?!
Where?!

In reply to Domic

Why not start fresh with hungry youngsters? Are we just statisfied on being the whipping boys of cricket?

Can you name some of the hungry youngsters and their records?

Bravo still is the best allrounder WI has and he was named part of the ICC ODI team of the year just recently...Try covering up all you want by Having Bravo and Narine in the ODI eleven will help WI more than what you are trying to project.

How many replacements you have average better than Bravo's 25 average in regional cricket?

In reply to Domic
What is the matter with you people? This is not about Pollard, Bravo and Sammy. This is about an agreement not to victimise which was broken. This is about the findings of the Task Force appointed by the same WICB that found the WICBandits culpable and guilty.
Do you understand now?

KUDOS to the Honorable Patrick Rosseau...a man heralded by Chrissy for being the most ethical President in the history of West Indies cricket.

Things we know the Honorable Rosseau wouldnt do...

Sack a West Indies captain without due process

Start a media company to profit from WI media rights giving rise to a clear conflict of interest

In reply to brians_da_best

Allrounder of the ICC ODI team of the Year not selected for the WI ODI team without explanation. What do you call that?

I do not mind the sacking of Pollard or Sammy since they were not good anyway. But Bravo was the best.

While the Task force has laid portion of blame on players (Not Just Bravo, Pollard and Sammy but all of them) they clearly stated who the Major culprit is. What actions have been taken on them anyway? Why is the Task Force recommendation partially implemented and that too on the lesser of the culprits by the report..

In reply to CricSham

Well I'm sure allyuh know what has finally hit the fan.
Uncle Pat knows the Constitution well since Peter Short had to remind him of 'natural justice' during the South Africa crisis.

That said these are very serious questions. Nice to see everyone coming back to the real question here - the Lucky Report.
Cameron should have been removed since then but the incompetents known as the WICB were all under the spell of Hell.

Wish I had time to respond in detail.
Good to see Uncle Pat is well enough to respond to this mess.
The entire Board should resign starting with Cameron.

Justice for Bravo et al.

In reply to FanAttick

If you are currently paid by the Board as an Executive President, are you aware that those payments are ultra vires because they are not provided for in the Constitution and may have to be refunded?

Pupa Jebus - dem men good yuh see!!

In reply to brians_da_best
Victimisation. Yes. Just 6 weeks ago Bravo was the annointed Captain. Pollard and Sammy were the stars.
Now suddenly they can't make the team?
If that is not victimisation tell me what is?
It is high time we so called UPSTANDING West Indians stop the insularity. Fair is fair and right is right.
And many of you here curse white American Police when you are no better.
Stand on principle or shut up. Wrong can't be right just because you don't like Bravo.

In reply to FuzzyWuzzy

There seems to be two issues here. Whether there is a right via the WICB constitution for certain executives to receive pay, and whether Bravo et al were victimized and could sue

In reply to sudden

If the source of the Rousseau commentary is Rousseau - rest assured that he knows the constitution since Myers Fletcher Gordon is closely associated with the WICB.

Then there is the 'natural justice' issue which Peter Short had to remind Rousseau about back in 98.

There are other issues including Digicel and the sponsorship fee and the Lucky Report is always at the centre of any of these discussions.

Some folks should have been run from West Indies cricket forever after that report.

In reply to Commie

That you could recommend someone who thought going public on a medical issue was decent speaks volumes. That he was also incorrect was too good.

Ambition and di love of power gwin destroy all of allyuh.

Good ting di only red car I love is my lil Corolla. No red Benz fi me - Waaaaaaaaaah hahaahahahaha

In reply to Chrissy

You really want to lash out at that?

The man is one of the only executives ever associated with Cricket or politics in the region to apologise for a mistake he made.

You want to talk about your hero and his godfather lying and saying Hooper was injured.

Or colluding with Ken Gordon in a late night coup to disregard the selectors recommendation of Sarwan as cappo for the WC in 2007.

of course raw ambition and power weren't involved there at all.

In reply to Commie

Big loud stewwwwwwwwwwwwps. Every one of allyuh is ambitious and wants power but none had done anything that low re a medical.

Keep climbing bro but remember Chrissy will still be at the bottom of di ladder waiting to greet allyuh (wid a loud laugh)as you crash.

Not one of allyuh gve a damn about West Indies cricket.

In reply to Chrissy


Below is an example of why you are called HypoChrissy. You like to talk about due process but when its people YOU like, it becomes a steeeewps.

It all began when West Indies selection panel made a formal recommendation for Ramnaresh Sarwan to take over from Shiv Chanderpaul as captain.

When the Sarwan nomination reached the board, it was rejected and Ken Gordon asked selection panel convenor Joey Carew to find out if Lara would be willing to take the job for a third time.

Carew and T&T cricket board president Deryck Murray met with Lara separately and sounded out his interest and commitment to leading the side into the 2007 World Cup.

Lara told the duo he would consider it if he got the full, unconditional support of the board. After those meetings, Carew and Murray reported that Lara said all the right things about his future and his commitment to West Indies cricket.

Gordon himself met with Lara to help convince the champion batsman that his leadership was needed to present a strong West Indies side at the World Cup.

Gordon felt he needed to act swiftly with his Lara appointment because an empowered cricket committee -- consisting of members with a strong anti-Lara sentiment -- could potentially derail the plans.

By now, the cricket committee got wind of the plans and some members went public to make it clear that they supported a long-term captain. Clive Lloyd and Andy Roberts were among the committee members who publicly supported Sarwan's candidacy for the post.

The weekend before his announcement, Gordon called a meeting of the WICB's executive committee (made up of the six regional board presidents) to listen to recommendations from himself and Murray for Lara to be confirmed. Jackie Hendricks did not dial in to the conference call, meaning that the Jamaica Cricket Association (JCA) was not represented at the meeting.

At that meeting, Gordon got approval from the majority of the executive committee and he instructed the outgoing CEO Roger Brathwaite to make arrangements for a press conference to make the announcement.

Brathwaite then told the president that the executive committee could not choose a captain because the board's own internal rules call for the full board (two directors from each territory) to approve the decision.

Gordon then asked the board presidents to consult with the six other directors and get a consensus on Lara.

In Guyana, Chetram Singh was having trouble reaching Bish Panday, his counterpart on the board. Jackie Hendricks and Dave Cameron, the two Jamaican directors, were left out of the loop altogether.

The rest of the directors were waiting for a board meeting to reconvene to vote on the matter when they heard that Ken Gordon had made the announcement on live radio with Lara at his side.

In reply to Pacy

Didn't I tell you this would happen. Any employer would have done the same. Fire the employer on any ground. Its almost impossible to prove victimisation. By proof, I mean proof that would hold up in a court of law.

WICB played this smart. Ramdin and Sammy need to prepare for their sacking in due course.


What the players did in India was shocking, and they have to face the consequences

4a15465005
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages