1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
2 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
3 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
4 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
5 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
6 -nan -nan -nan -nan -nan
7 -nan -nan -nan -nan
8 -nan -nan -nan
9 -nan -nan
10 -nan
When I run the analysis grouping all 96 samples as one population, it calculates population summary statistics normally. If the samples are run as multiple populations, the summary stats also produce a lot of -nan values. Is this a computational error, or is it because there is no difference between my populations? If that is the case, shouldn't all of the Fst values be 0? I guess what I'm trying to ask is what does the -nan mean? Clearly I need to troubleshoot but I don't know where to start.
The code I've been using is as follows:
populations -b 1 -P ~/bigdata/ddRAD_Oct2015_Fusarium/Mar03_strictmap_popbeetles -M ~/bigdata/ddRAD_Oct2015_Fusarium/populations/populations_beetles -m 5 -p 2 -f p_value --fstats --fasta_strict --vcf --vcf_haplotypes --phylip --structure --log_fst_comp --verbose
Thank you!
Chrissy