Fwd: UNIQUE and SPECIAL CHAIN LETTER 3:

[b]

ATBTC
-----Original Message-----

From: b <rrdd...@aol.com>
To: rrdd...@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 2:08 pm
Subject: Fwd: UNIQUE and SPECIAL CHAIN LETTER 3:

                                                LET'S DO OURSELVES 

                                                               A

                                        SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION 

                                                             and

                                                           X-37B

                                       Richard DePersio with Cyber-Friends

PROPOSAL 5:

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: We should phone and/or leave a message at the website

of our governor and state legislators demanding that they call for a Constitutional Convention

aka Article 5 Convention to which they would appoint delegates. It would require 34 states to    call for a convention. Proposed amendments have to be approved by 38 states or by 38 pairs

of delegates at the convention. In the past, the possibility of a convention has prompted

congress to act by passing amendments via the other method: approval of over two-thirds

of both houses of congress, thereby, enabling congress to control the amendment process 

but being compelled to take into account the wishes of the states. We should demand 

Constitutional Convention and no usurping by congress. 

PROPOSAL 6:

COMMERCE CLAUSE: Said convention should propose an amendment reiterating the real

definition of the clause predicated on the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Primarily

between 1905-21, 1933-46, 1963-72 and 2009-present, congress has invoked "Commerce

Clause" for non-commerce or intra-state commerce matters. This is also true of many

presidential executive orders, executive branch regulations and judicial decisions. These

constitute unconstitutional acts for he U.S. Constitution only gives congress authority in 16

areas. This is why, we don't won't congress too involved with amendment process. They

would not be inclined to forfeit powers unconstitutionally seized.

PROPOSAL 7:

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION-PLUS: Delegates or committees appointed by delegates

should list laws, orders, regs, decisions rendered that are in violation and decide or

recommend if act should be retained or modified or replaced or deemed null-and-void

and not be replaced (Citizens are victims of too many laws and regs infringing on our

liberties!). They must then frame in the form of an omnibus amendment. This action

might provoke a Constitutional Crisis with Congress claiming Constitutional Convention

exceeding mandate while states harbor the view that such action would serve to define

Nullification Doctrine.  

PROPOSAL 8:

AMENDMENT 17: Revoke it. Superficially, it appears to have empowered the citizenry

but further probing indicates otherwise and, further, violates intent of Founding Father's.

Their Master Plan: Voters would directly elect members of state legislators and members

of House of Representatives who, therefore, would strongly fight to defend state powers

and citizen's rights in the case of the former and citizen's rights in the case of the latter.

State legislators would choose electors (now, voters choose electors) who, in turn, would

choose president. The president would, in effect, be 3 steps (now, 2) removed from the

voters and would be inclined to fight for a big and powerful fed gov to carry out the 16

responsibilities of fed gov. Each house of a state legislature would choose a U.S.

Senator. During the first 'progressive era or error' in 1913, voters would henceforth

choose U.S. Senators. Good idea; power to the people. Wrong!!! Bad idea. Under

original system a senator's desire to empower fed gov would be held in check by the

strings attached to him by state legislators (who are interested in state powers {first} and

citizen's rights {second}). Example: Major Healthcare Reform giving fed gov control

over an additional 17% of economy and shrinking state authority and citizen's rights in

the realm of healthcare with this humongous bill. Senators would fear that state

legislators wouldn't extend their contracts for another 6 years when their terms expired 

and might pressure them to resign or recall them. The Founding Fathers gave birth to

an ingenious plan which progressives (later known as liberals) had the audacity to mess

with and weaken not empowered us. There's an old army saying: "If it ain't broke, don't

fix it!"Further, the nature of the beast - healthcare reform - - it is so large that it should

have necessitated a Constitutional Amendment. Instead it was shoved through - with

members of congress not reading bill indirectly written by president george soros - on

a simple majority vote bypassing 60-vote Senate approval (filibuster).

PROPOSAL 9:

X-37B to CONSTITUTION: Last year, Obama signed a directive enabling greater overt cooperation between military and NASA (one thumb's up for Obama). Let's exercise it

to prevent Obama from destroying NASA. This year the Air Force orbited for one month

the X-37B unmanned 'secret' (launch was televised live) which presently resembles a

one-third sized version of Space Shuttle. It is suspected to have carried equipment in

it's cargo bay for testing (equipment that might be deployed as part of future military

satellites). It was landed by remote control. How many orbital test flights were conducted

in the past? We are in the dark. It would appear close to being operational and appear to

have an appearance similar to final version. The operational craft should be called

CONSTITUTION in order to drive liberals who don't believe in the real Constitution but

the bogus "progressive 'living' constitution" crazy! At least one declassified version 

should be put on loan to NASA so that NASA can develop it to bring cargo to the

International (our - we paid bulk of cost) Space Station decreasing our future dependence

on Russia (we have a plan to prevent costly dependence entirely - see previous two chain

letters and articles at www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com and rickscisite.blogspot.com and

groups.google.com/group/nasa-our-way).

WHAT is at STAKE? OUR LIBERTY and ONE of OUR MAIN SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL ENGINES of OUR ECONOMY.

[Al Globus]

just to let you know.  Any emails I get from you with all caps in the title will be deleted without reading.

I'm not fond of being shouted at.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The International Space Station's (ISS) most important legacy may be jump-starting space tourism. Consider: the first space tourist, Dennis Tito, was supposed to go to the Soviet era Mir space station. Under pressure from NASA, Russia de-orbited the Mir which resulted in Mr. Tito going to the ISS instead. Now the Mir was a terrific space station, but by the time of Tito's trip it was also old, smelly, crowded and probably not all that nice. The ISS was brand new, shiny, much more roomy, etc. Mr. Tito came back to Earth with glowing accounts of how great space is. Would his experience have been as good on Mir?

Al Globus

http://alglobus.net

Views expressed in this email are only my opinions and are not the position of any organization I'm familiar with.

[G B Leatherwood]

All,

I don't know who "b<rrdd...@aol.com" is or what they think they're doing, but I believe this is entirely the wrong group to broadcast this kind of crap to.

G B Leatherwood

[b]