Ah, sorry. I saw "next value" and thought "nextval", not setval.
The `Sequence` object just seems to support a 'next_value()'
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/core/defaults.html#sqlalchemy.schema.SequenceI looked in the source, and it looks like the postgres dialect only has a `nextval` operation. Sqlalchemy's compiler and dialects seem to only support `create sequence` and `nextval` (there's no "alter sequence [restart with]" or "setval" equivalents). It looks like you can only pass in a start value for the sequence on creation.
I think you may need to handle this with literal sql, and create a ticket or try to patch.