Support for a generic transcoder?

[gr...@klout.com]

Hi,

We are using spy memcached in a scala project, and I'm playing around with a serialization framework that has a generic deserializer only (type information is required).  Thus, I cannot extend the SerializationTranscoder as it is not generic.

I see that the Transcoder interface is generic and I could technically implement it to get to my goal. However, SerializationTranscoder & BaseSerializingTranscoder have a lot of implementation internals that I don't want to duplicate to avoid breaking abstraction, they may change, etc.

Another option is to serialize / deserialize the objects to/from Bytes before calling get / set and provide a serializer implementation that assumes input is already in bytes.

Is there a recommended way to go forward with this?

Thanks!

-greg

[Matt Ingenthron]

I've had the same problem myself a bunch of times.

Michael:  should we change this up?  Need to consider what that hierarchy should be.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spymemcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spymemcached...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spymem...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spymemcached.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[gr...@klout.com]

Thanks Matt,

I appreciate the possible solution of this in the library. Should I file a ticket?

-greg