DEBUG [net.spy.memcached.protocol.binary.BinaryMemcachedNodeImpl] - Not writing timed out op.

80 views
Skip to first unread message

Ashish Gupta

unread,
May 3, 2013, 4:00:27 AM5/3/13
to spymem...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I am getting the below debug message while setting the key. I am using spymemcache 2.8.4 version. Please let me know how to resolve the issue.  I am using the below to create the client and shutdown the client everytime.

Using CacheMap to cache the data:

CacheMap cacheMap = new CacheMap(memcachedClient,0,"prefix");
cacheMap.putAll(datamap);

MemcachedClient memcachedClient = new MemcachedClient(new BinaryConnectionFactory(),AddrUtil.getAddresses(getMemcachedHostName() + ":" + getMemcachedPort()));
             

2013-05-03 11:15:06,078 DEBUG [net.spy.memcached.protocol.binary.BinaryMemcachedNodeImpl] - Finished writing Cmd: 1 Opaque: 55 Key: ORGKEYBYDBID_17265 Cas: 0 Exp: 0 Flags: 1 Data Length: 1819
2013-05-03 11:15:06,078 DEBUG [net.spy.memcached.protocol.binary.BinaryMemcachedNodeImpl] - Not writing timed out op.
2013-05-03 11:15:06,078 DEBUG [net.spy.memcached.protocol.binary.BinaryMemcachedNodeImpl] - Not writing timed out op.

ashish saxena

unread,
May 4, 2013, 10:18:25 PM5/4/13
to spymem...@googlegroups.com
check the version




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spymemcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spymemcached...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spymem...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spymemcached?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

ingenthr

unread,
Jun 5, 2013, 3:26:02 AM6/5/13
to spymem...@googlegroups.com
What appears to be happening is a timeout occurred for some other reason and then the next few operations behind that were timed out by the time they were to be written to the network.  Because they were timed out already, they aren't sent.

Did you tune the timeout value very low by chance?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages