I recall previously having to hardcode the port number in one of the
system files, but I believe what was requiring that was fixed some
time ago. I'll provide a pastie link to the output of my diagnostic
output below, which looks problematic, but I'm not sure what the
problem is or how to fix it.
Anyone have ideas? Thanks.
** Spork -d output **
http://pastie.org/907842
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sporkgem" group.
To post to this group, send email to spor...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sporkgem+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sporkgem?hl=en.
> > sporkgem+u...@googlegroups.com<sporkgem%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.c om>
I'm not sure if I ran this correctly but here is the output. I'll
have to look at it in a bit, but it looks like a bunch of missing
gems. I wonder if this has anything to do with RVM and using
gemsets. Thanks.
http://pastie.org/908275
I ran ruby-prof and after several attempts of hitting ctrl + c once
was unable to get it to kill just spork and to write the file.
Thankfully, an exception was thrown on one attempt due to an existing
spork instance running and that provided the desired output file.
That said, the server never fully started, though i think the bulk of
the slowness happens prior to that point.
Here is a link to the output (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1788885/
profile2.txt). I skimmed over the numbers and as far as I can tell
nothing looks to stand out too much. Does anything jump out at you?
I appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Eric
On Apr 7, 5:20 pm, Tim Harper <timchar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good guess. :-)
I ran ruby-prof and after several attempts of hitting ctrl + c once
was unable to get it to kill just spork and to write the file.
Thankfully, an exception was thrown on one attempt due to an existing
spork instance running and that provided the desired output file.
That said, the server never fully started, though i think the bulk of
the slowness happens prior to that point.
Here is a link to the output (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1788885/
profile2.txt). I skimmed over the numbers and as far as I can tell
nothing looks to stand out too much. Does anything jump out at you?
I appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Eric
On Apr 8, 12:31 am, Tim Harper <timchar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Right, the server never loaded in the example I posted because an
exception was raised prior due to an instance of spork already
running. As for having waited the other times, yes the server was
up...I saw the standard text output displayed when the server is up
and I begin with autospec.
On Apr 8, 1:44 am, Tim Harper <timchar...@gmail.com> wrote:
$ ruby-prof -p graph -f ~/Desktop/profile.txt `which spork` -- rspec
Using RSpec
Preloading Rails environment
Loading Spork.prefork block...
/Users/Eric/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p249@33n/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/
gem_dependency.rb:119:Warning: Gem::Dependency#version_requirements is
deprecated and will be removed on or after August 2010. Use
#requirement
No server is running
Running specs locally:
Spork is ready and listening on 8989!
^C