PILOT FORMS

35 views
Skip to first unread message

David Herzberg

unread,
Sep 4, 2014, 3:19:50 PM9/4/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hello all, I'd like to get back to using the google group for this project. I've created a pilot form for the 4-9 month age range for the SPM-2 Infant-Toddler, attached here. It includes 147 items, almost all of the ones that you wanted for this age range. I did delete a few that seemed redundant or very difficult to rate, but those deletions are preserved in the track changes.

I edited many of the items to make them more concise and readable. The originals are preserved in track changes, so you can compare.

My thought was that for the pilot study, we'd have one form for 4-9 months and one for 10-30 months, on a sample of 200-300 kids across these age ranges. Do you think these are the right age divisions/ranges.

I will leave it up to you all as to how you want to review this and get me feedback.

Best, Dave
SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_090414_DSH.docx

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Sep 4, 2014, 4:55:51 PM9/4/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Dave!



We have a phone meeting on Monday, will discuss, and get back to you.



Tara

Tara J. Glennon, EdD, OTR/L, FAOTA
Professor of Occupational Therapy
Quinnipiac University
Mt. Carmel Ave.
MNH-362L
Hamden, CT 06518
(203) 582-8293[X]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply email and destroy the original and all copies of this message and its attachments.
________________________________
From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of David Herzberg [boy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:19 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: PILOT FORMS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPM-2 Project Workspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com<mailto:spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com<mailto:spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spm-2-project-workspace.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Sep 8, 2014, 3:07:27 PM9/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



Thanks for getting to this project so quickly -- we know how busy you are and really appreciate it!



We were very pleased with the edits and felt that your touch was exactly what it needed! We only have a few comments (noted in track changes) and a note to you at the beginning of the document with regard to numbers and age groups.



Please let us know the next steps.



Thanks,

Tara

________________________________

From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of David Herzberg [boy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:19 PM

SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_090414_DSH author feedback 9-8-2014.docx

Diane Parham

unread,
Sep 8, 2014, 3:13:02 PM9/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Tara.  Nice message to Dave. And good work today. Onward!
Diane

>>> "Glennon, Tara Prof." <Tara.G...@quinnipiac.edu> 9/8/2014 1:07 PM >>>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com.

David Herzberg

unread,
Sep 8, 2014, 4:13:33 PM9/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
All thanks for your comments - I'll get back to you soon!

Ateac...@aol.com

unread,
Sep 8, 2014, 6:05:14 PM9/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Yes, Thank you Tara.
And thanks again to everyone.
We are doing great work ...and so is Dave :)
Diana

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Sep 30, 2014, 9:39:38 PM9/30/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



Just wanted to touch base on the status of the author edit/responses on the Infant-Toddler list. Also, did you plan on going through the caregiver questions so that we could pilot the caregiver form when we pilot the Infant Toddler form?



Thanks,



Tara

Tara J. Glennon, EdD, OTR/L, FAOTA
Professor of Occupational Therapy
Quinnipiac University
275 Mt. Carmel Ave | MNH-362L | Hamden, CT 06518
203-582-8293[X] | tara.g...@quinnipiac.edu

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply email and destroy the original and all copies of this message and its attachments.
________________________________
From: Glennon, Tara Prof.
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 3:07 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: PILOT FORMS

David Herzberg

unread,
Oct 1, 2014, 12:49:06 PM10/1/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi all, I'm sorry that I've not made any progress on these issues since last we spoke. It's something I think about every day, but all of my actual time work has been devoted to getting the ABAS-3 into production. I expect to be able to turn back to the SPM-2 in October, and I will certainly keep you posted on that.

Thanks for understanding, Dave

David Herzberg

unread,
Oct 8, 2014, 7:25:43 PM10/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
OK - I've reviewed your edits and notes.

For all the edits on the items themselves (including going back to the original wording on some), this all seems fine to me and I'll implement the changes.

For the global change to "dislike or shows distress", with these terms defined in the form instructions - yes this is fine, will make this change.

With your reference to age ranges and sample sizes, are you suggesting there should be three versions of the form?
- 4-9 months
- 10-15 months
- 16-30 months

I don't think theres a need for that, but perhaps you were just suggesting that we get at least 100 typical and 100 sensory issues for each age range. Please clarify.

Thanks, Dave

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Oct 8, 2014, 8:02:40 PM10/8/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave. We just wanted to be sure that we got each age range in the sample. But, the greater the number for each age range, the better.



Tara

Tara J. Glennon, EdD, OTR/L, FAOTA
Professor of Occupational Therapy
Quinnipiac University
275 Mt. Carmel Ave | MNH-362L | Hamden, CT 06518
203-582-8293[X] | tara.g...@quinnipiac.edu

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply email and destroy the original and all copies of this message and its attachments.
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 7:25 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PILOT FORMS

David Herzberg

unread,
Oct 10, 2014, 7:55:57 PM10/10/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Here's the latest version of the Infant-Toddler 4-9 month pilot form. This is close to the format we would use to collect data on Survey Monkey. If you approve of this form, the next step is to get it proofread, and then adapt it to the older age range.
SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_v2_DSH.docx

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Oct 31, 2014, 2:06:29 PM10/31/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave: The format of this 4m-9m form is good for the author group. You can go ahead and proof and apply this format to the other ages. We also wanted to make sure that you were doing the same format for the caregiver form, correct? Thanks and have a nice weekend.



Tara

David Herzberg

unread,
Oct 31, 2014, 2:30:01 PM10/31/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi All, thanks for the feedback. I will proceed. Have you all had a chance to review the information I sent about bringing the adult form into the SPM-2 project?

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Oct 31, 2014, 2:31:08 PM10/31/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Diane P is putting together a list of questions related to the adult version and will follow-up with you. Thanks.

Diane Parham

unread,
Nov 3, 2014, 1:09:52 PM11/3/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com

Hi Dave,


I spoke with Erna Blanche a little over a week ago to make sure she understood that royalties would need to be worked out if she were to join the SPM family, and that royalties would be distributed among other authors, not necessarily evenly.  She expressed that she would consider it an advantage to the adult questionnaire if it were to become part of the SPM, and she would still like to pursue this. In our discussion, we both agreed that a third author on the adult questionnaire, Megan Chang, should also be included as an author on that particular form, if it becomes an SPM instrument. 

 

I then went back to the SPM authors with this info, and we discussed the implications of having the two new authors of the SPM Adult Form joining the SPM group.  (I would also be one of the Adult Form authors.)  We quickly realized that we need more clarification from you regarding the Detailed Royalty Worksheet that you recently sent us, before we go forward with a plan to add the Adult form.  

 

Here are our questions -- they all refer to your Detailed Royalty Worksheet, with the assumption that it encompasses the existing SPM forms as well as those under development now:

 

1. What exactly would be included in the Comprehensive Kit? 

2. What exactly do you envision the Comprehensive Manual would contain, how would it be formatted (electronic, hard copies, or both), and how would it be organized?  

3. As we all anticipated, dividing up royalties will require time and careful thought. Is there an industry norm for how this should be done in projects with multiple authors of multiple related products, such as the SPM family?

 

We undoubtedly will have some more questions for you, after you have clarified the above starting points.

Diane​




Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 12:30 PM

To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PILOT FORMS
Hi All, thanks for the feedback. I will proceed. Have you all had a chance to review the information I sent about bringing the adult form into the SPM-2 project?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPM-2 Project Workspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail, including all attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided for under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the University of New Mexico.

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 7, 2014, 4:49:37 PM11/7/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
I just read through the Caregiver items, and it strikes me that this is an adult form, with items that are specific to the parent-infant dyad (30 such items, 14 of which are in Participation). There are 81 items that are not specific to the parent-infant dyad (e.g., they are "generic" adult items). But now that we are considering adding an adult form to the SPM-2, we ought to consider how we want to integrate that adult form with this caregiver form. If we can reach an agreement to add the adult form, then we can compare the two and see how to integrate them.

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Nov 17, 2014, 12:29:12 PM11/17/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



At this point, given that the possibility of an adult form has not been finalized, we would like you to move forward with the pilot of the infant version, inclusive of the caregiver form as we previously provided. Is there a problem with moving forward with that project? Also, can you give us the timeline of when that pilot might go out?



Thanks,

Diane Parham

unread,
Nov 17, 2014, 1:43:01 PM11/17/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Dave, to add on to Tara's message sent about an hour ago:

The adults in the Infant-Toddler (IT) normative sample will ALL be primary caregivers of infants and toddlers, and they should not be a dominant group in the normative data for the Adult SPM. In fact, they don't need to be represented at all as a distinct group for the Adult SPM. So this is another reason why we don't want to wait on the finalized Adult items -- the items for the IT Caregiver and Adult forms don't need to overlap with exact wording of specific items.

We'd like to initiate pilot data collection for the SPM-IT forms as soon as possible, then initiate the SPM-Teen pilot data collection by February 2015 at the latest, so that both data collection efforts overlap in time.

Diane

-----Original Message-----
From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [mailto:spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Glennon, Tara Prof.
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 10:29 AM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: PILOT FORMS

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 21, 2014, 2:54:01 PM11/21/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Sorry for the delay in reply. Let's proceed with the pilot of the IT form and current caregiver form. Before data collection can begin we need to finalize the three forms (IT-younger, IT-older, Caregiver) and get them up on Survey Monkey. All data collection for the pilot study will be done online. The limiting factor on the timeline for this pilot study continues to be my time. I will keep you posted on my progress. What will get this project moving full steam ahead is to hand it over to my colleague John Williams as the Project Director. That will happen early next year.

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 21, 2014, 8:08:27 PM11/21/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Here is the first draft of the 10-30 month IT pilot form. All of the new 10-30 mo items are highlighted in yellow. I removed enough of the younger items to get the total item count down to 150. See one comment calling for an example in one of the 10-30 mo items.
SPM IT 10-30mo pilot form_draft_112114.docx

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 22, 2014, 6:33:04 PM11/22/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thank you Dave. 
Regarding an example of 

1.      Tries to touch certain textures or objects[DH1]  over and over again.


 [DH1]What’s an example of this?

 
It would be the infant /toddler who seeks rubbing or touching the corner of a blanket or a certain piece of clothing, fabric, toy or object repetitively or to the exclusion of anything else. 
 
Diana
 
 

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 22, 2014, 6:34:22 PM11/22/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Diana - I will add this example to my draft form.

David Herzberg

unread,
Nov 22, 2014, 7:58:18 PM11/22/14
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
All, attached is my first draft of the Caregiver Form, in track changes so you can see my edits and changes.
SPM IT Caregiver pilot form_draft_112114.docx

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Jan 2, 2015, 10:49:03 PM1/2/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hello Dave,



Thank you for the draft of the 10-30m IT form for the pilot. The format is okay with the authors. Upon review, however, it seems as if a few praxis items were not included. I have attached the praxis list with yellow highlights for the items that are missing. We were not sure if this was an error or if you deleted for a specific reason. The authors felt that they should be included. Thanks.



I am also attaching the final Caregiver Form for the pilot.



Thanks,



Tara

From Dave: Here is the first draft of the 10-30 month IT pilot form. All of the new 10-30 mo items are highlighted in yellow. I removed enough of the younger items to get the total item count down to 150. See one comment calling for an example in one of the 10-30 mo items.
missing from 10+ list from Dave.xlsx
SPM IT Caregiver pilot form AUTHORS revisions on_draft_121814.docx

David Herzberg

unread,
Jan 26, 2015, 7:19:39 PM1/26/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi All, sorry for the late reply. John Williams and I are working with the two forms (Caregiver and 10-30 month IT) to implement the necessary changes and see if we have additional feedback for the group. We would like to join your next regularly scheduled call and have that be the official kick of John's role as Project Director going forward. When is that call scheduled for?

In addition to discussing how to finalize the forms for the IT pilot study, we'll also want to revisit the Adult form and come to agreement on terms for including that as part of the SPM-2 project.

Best, Dave

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Jan 26, 2015, 7:25:31 PM1/26/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



We meet every Monday at 11amEST. We would welcome a chance to "meet" John again in his office role on the SPM team!



Jasmin set up the following for us:

1. Please join my meeting.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/378325965

2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.

Dial +1 (267) 507-0016[X]<https://mail.quinnipiac.edu/owa/#>
Access Code: 378-325-965
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 378-325-965



Thanks,

Tara

Diane Parham

unread,
Jan 26, 2015, 9:46:30 PM1/26/15
to <spm-2-project-workspace@googlegroups.com>
It looks like all the SPM authors will be able to join the call next Monday, Feb 2nd, at 8 AM Pacific (11 AM Eastern). Actually Cheryl can join us at about 10 min after the start time, if not sooner. So shall we go for next Monday the 2nd?

Diane


Sent from my iPad

Cheryl Ecker

unread,
Jan 26, 2015, 9:49:58 PM1/26/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Yes.

David Herzberg

unread,
Jan 27, 2015, 4:24:44 PM1/27/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi all, thanks for your enthusiasm for scheduling this call. Unfortunately, 8a Pacific is challenging for John and I, both of whom have school carpool responsibilities. I will send out a Doodle poll to try for a different time where we all can talk.

I will aim for a time in the week of 2/23, up until that point we are putting the finishing touches on ABAS-3 - all hands on deck!

Best, Dave

John Williams

unread,
Jan 27, 2015, 5:06:30 PM1/27/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com

Thanks, everyone, for your patience. I’m so looking forward to turning my attention more fully the SPM-2 – but still a bit in overdrive mode finalizing the ABAS-3 for NASP – talk to you soon!

 

John

 

From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [mailto:spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Herzberg
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 1:25 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PILOT FORMS

 

Hi all, thanks for your enthusiasm for scheduling this call. Unfortunately, 8a Pacific is challenging for John and I, both of whom have school carpool responsibilities. I will send out a Doodle poll to try for a different time where we all can talk.

 

I will aim for a time in the week of 2/23, up until that point we are putting the finishing touches on ABAS-3 - all hands on deck!

 

Best, Dave

--

Ateac...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 27, 2015, 6:46:00 PM1/27/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Good luck John!
 
Diana A Henry, MS, OTR/L, FAOTA

Diane Parham

unread,
Jan 27, 2015, 8:23:26 PM1/27/15
to <spm-2-project-workspace@googlegroups.com>
Best of luck, John and Dave, on tying the final ribbon around the ABAS-3! Looking forward to our conference call in February.

Diane

Sent from my iPhone

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Feb 2, 2015, 12:01:20 PM2/2/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



We had our SPM conference call today and began working on the two AOTA posters. As we craft the infant poster, we were hoping to have data from the research/pilot testing. Can you share with us the timeline for doing the pilot testing for the infant forms (both age groups) and the caregiver form?



Also, when we meet with you and John, we would like to add to the agenda: concepts that we would like to highlight (or stay away from) in the poster presentations. For example, are we mentioning the Caregiver form during this conference presentation? Reminder: last year we purposefully did not mention Caregiver form.



Thanks,



Tara

Tara J. Glennon, EdD, OTR/L, FAOTA
Professor of Occupational Therapy
Quinnipiac University
275 Mt. Carmel Ave | MNH-362L | Hamden, CT 06518
tara.g...@quinnipiac.edu | 203-582-8293[X]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender via reply email and destroy the original and all copies of this message and its attachments.
________________________________
From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of David Herzberg [boy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 7:19 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PILOT FORMS

Hi All, sorry for the late reply. John Williams and I are working with the two forms (Caregiver and 10-30 month IT) to implement the necessary changes and see if we have additional feedback for the group. We would like to join your next regularly scheduled call and have that be the official kick of John's role as Project Director going forward. When is that call scheduled for?

In addition to discussing how to finalize the forms for the IT pilot study, we'll also want to revisit the Adult form and come to agreement on terms for including that as part of the SPM-2 project.

Best, Dave

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPM-2 Project Workspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com<mailto:spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com<mailto:spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com>.

David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 5, 2015, 7:44:25 PM2/5/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi All, Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you on this. See my responses below in ALL CAPS.

Can you share with us the timeline for doing the pilot testing for the infant forms (both age groups) and the caregiver form? OUR GOAL IS TO START THE PILOT STUDY WITH THESE FORMS BY MARCH 31. BY START I MEAN THE FORMS ARE FINALIZED AND UP ON SURVEY MONKEY, WE'VE ENROLLED DATA COLLECTORS, AND PERHAPS A FEW FORMS HAVE COME IN. SO THERE WILL NOT BE ENOUGH DATA, SOON ENOUGH, TO INCORPORATE IN YOUR POSTERS.



Also, when we meet with you and John, we would like to add to the agenda:  concepts that we would like to highlight (or stay away from) in the poster presentations.  For example, are we mentioning the Caregiver form during this conference presentation?  Reminder:  last year we purposefully did not mention Caregiver form. YES WE CAN TALK ABOUT THIS, I DON'T REMEMBER WHY WE DIDN'T MENTION THE CAREGIVER FORM LAST YEAR, BUT I DON'T SEE WHY WE COULDN'T TALK ABOUT IT THIS YEAR.


Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Feb 6, 2015, 8:51:58 PM2/6/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



Thanks for the update. I have a slight dilemma: based on our previous timeline, I have a group of Quinnipiac students who were going to do a small study/project with the Infant forms in March/April. Is there any way to have the forms ready earlier than March 31? Or, if you are programming all the questions into survey monkey, can that be created earlier? If so, I can copy the pilot surveymonkey url to make a second url of the Infant items to use for just my study.



Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,



Tara


David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 6, 2015, 11:50:33 PM2/6/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Do they need the caregiver forms too, or just the infant rating forms?

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Feb 7, 2015, 12:13:13 AM2/7/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
I could do just the infant forms.

David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 7, 2015, 7:05:15 PM2/7/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
I hesitate to make any promises before the ABAS-3 is officially launched. But given how close we are to finalizing the infant forms, it does seem doable. Feel free to prompt us on this towards the end of Feb!

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 10:10:50 AM2/8/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thanks.

David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 11, 2015, 1:01:08 PM2/11/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hello all, I'm posting here my edited version of the SPM IT Caregiver form, with the suffix '_DSHcleancopy'. I basically accepted all of the suggestions on the authors' last draft, did some minor editorial cleanup on a few items, and added the rating scale instructions at the front. If you all approve of this version, then it is ready to go into editorial where it will be finalized for the pilot study. I'm also attaching the authors' last draft for comparison purposes.

Best, Dave
SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_090414_DSH author feedback 9-8-2014.docx
SPM IT Caregiver pilot form AUTHORS revisions on_draft_121814_DSHcleancopy.docx

ateachabout

unread,
Feb 12, 2015, 8:00:26 AM2/12/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Thank you Dave!

Sent from my iPhone. 

Like us on Facebook: 
Henry Occupational Therapy 


Please pardon the typos.

On Feb 11, 2015, at 11:01 AM, David Herzberg <boy...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello all, I'm posting here my edited version of the SPM IT Caregiver form, with the suffix '_DSHcleancopy'. I basically accepted all of the suggestions on the authors' last draft, did some minor editorial cleanup on a few items, and added the rating scale instructions at the front. If you all approve of this version, then it is ready to go into editorial where it will be finalized for the pilot study. I'm also attaching the authors' last draft for comparison purposes.

Best, Dave

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SPM-2 Project Workspace" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spm-2-project-wor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com.
<SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_090414_DSH author feedback 9-8-2014.docx>
<SPM IT Caregiver pilot form AUTHORS revisions on_draft_121814_DSHcleancopy.docx>

Glennon, Tara Prof.

unread,
Feb 16, 2015, 12:30:31 PM2/16/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dave,



We are a little bit confused.



1. Can you post what is the most current version of the Infant Items so that we are clear which version we are currently working with?

2. Your message says that the file is called Caregiver DSHclean copy and that you attached original for comparison but the other file you attached is the infant items rather than the caregiver items.







________________________________

From: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com [spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of David Herzberg [boy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:01 PM
To: spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PILOT FORMS

David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 16, 2015, 1:14:37 PM2/16/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
I apologize for the confusion. Here is the status of the three forms for the IT pilot study

IT 4-9 months: version attached here has been approved by the authors and is ready for editorial.
IT 10-30 months: John is working with the authors' latest changes and will post next version when he is ready.
IT Caregiver: version attached here is a clean copy in which I've accepted the authors' last round of changes and made a few minor editorial cleanups. Also attached here is the author's last version, marked up with track-changes, in case you want to compare the two.

So there are three attachments: IT 4-9 mos, and two versions of IT Caregiver.


SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_v2_DSH.docx
SPM IT Caregiver pilot form AUTHORS revisions on_draft_121814_DSHcleancopy.docx
SPM IT Caregiver pilot form AUTHORS revisions on_draft_121814.docx

David Herzberg

unread,
Feb 26, 2015, 6:58:18 PM2/26/15
to spm-2-proje...@googlegroups.com
Hello all, a quick summary of the call today:

Author action items:
1. Finish edits of SPM IT Caregiver form within 2 weeks
2. Send contact info to John for infant-toddler data collectors

WPS action items:
1. Finish edits of SPM IT 10-30 month rating form within 2 weeks
2. Review and respond to adult form contract issues

Also attached is the finalized version (ready for editorial) of the 4-9 month rating form.
SPM IT 4-9mo pilot form_v3_DSH.docx
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages