Ja Rule-Clap Back Mp3
Xochitl Lorts
The song is a diss track directed at 50 Cent and Eminem, with lines such as "Like Bush and Saddam, I'm-a find out where Em Laden's hiding and bomb him first", "And God gave me his blessings to handle my business, All these wanksta snitches, let the nina blow kisses, If she some how misses, he gon' meet the mistress, And 'Clap that boy' like Birdman and Clipse".[citation needed] Another line, "Fuck the Dog, beware of Rule, 'cause I'm the problem", was also interpreted as being aimed at DMX.[citation needed]. The song is the origin of the popular slang 'clap back' in street lingo meaning to respond or retaliate to personal attack or criticism.[citation needed]
It appears to be a recent coinage from rap music. The expression derives from an previous expression used in the song "Clap that boy" where clap means "shoot". Clap with that connotation actually dates back to the 90s:
This is not meant to be a formal definition of clapback like most terms we define on Dictionary.com, but is rather an informal word summary that hopefully touches upon the key aspects of the meaning and usage of clapback that will help our users expand their word mastery.
"Clap Back" by Ja Rule is an aggressive diss track aimed at 50 Cent and Eminem. The lyrics use violent and graphic language to threaten violence in response to perceived attacks from the two rappers. The chorus encourages his gangster friends to retaliate to any disrespect with violence, encouraging them to "clap back" or shoot back.
Ja Rule's clap back in the comments section is in direct response to the many things 50 Cent had to say regarding the curse he purportedly placed on the Timberwolves. In the Instagram post in question, the NBA team captioned a video clip of Fif going in hard on Ja and his failed halftime performance with, "50's here to get rid of the curse."
The latest back-and-forth in the neverending saga between 50 Cent and Ja Rule stems from the aforementioned 2019 halftime performance during which the response Ja elicited from the crowd in attendance at a Minnesota Timberwolves vs. Milwaukee Bucks game was less than stellar.
Ja's response to 50 Cent's most recent trolling session isn't even the first time in the past month that the "Always On Time" rhymer has made some noteworthy headlines regarding his arch-nemesis. Back in mid-March, Ja Rule opined that "50 copied" his music style back in the early 2000s when Melle Mel inferred that it was Ja who mimicked 50 Cent's street persona.
Sometime after Dana's departure, petitioner left his house with Karen Roberts to walk her home. According to petitioner's subsequent confession, during the walk they argued about whether Karen Roberts had given petitioner a venereal disease. At one point, Karen cursed him, and petitioner pushed her to the ground. When she got up, Karen was holding a heavy metal bar which she swung at petitioner. Petitioner blocked the blow and jerked the bar away. When Karen started to run, petitioner chased Karen Roberts across the street, north for half a block, east for half a block to some railroad tracks, north along the tracks for a full block and across another street, where he finally caught her. There, petitioner bludgeoned Karen to death with the metal bar. An autopsy on the body of Karen Roberts revealed massive head injuries. The back of her skull was caved in; she suffered six head lacerations, skull fractures "too numerous to count," and multiple contusions and bruises of the brain beneath the skull. These injuries were consistent with multiple blows, inflicted with the heavy iron bar identified as the murder weapon. Any one of the blows could have rendered Karen unconscious or caused her death. Karen also suffered abrasions on her face and contusions of the shoulder, arm, hip and thigh. On a scale of "one to ten," an expert witness rated the seriousness of Karen's injuries at "eight."
Eugene then went back to the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis and obtained a ruling from Judge Jean Hamilton of that court that a next-friend 27.26 petition was a viable procedure under Missouri law. With Judge Hamilton's ruling in hand, Eugene returned to the Missouri Supreme Court and renewed his motion for a stay of execution until the Circuit Court had a chance to resolve the question of petitioner's competency. The Missouri Supreme Court, on its own motion, postponed the execution date until January 15, 1986. On January 8, 1986, however, the Missouri Supreme Court issued an order which held that the next-friend 27.26 proceeding in state court was a legal nullity and that no further extensions of petitioner's execution date would be granted. The Missouri Supreme Court explained that, in its view, the October, 1984 state court ruling that petitioner was competent foreclosed all further inquiry into the matter. The Missouri Supreme Court did not hold a hearing or invite oral argument before handing down its decision.
In light of that backdrop, the Court must now consider petitioner's Witherspoon challenges. Petitioner challenges the striking for cause of three venirepersons Helen Sadowski, Maude Adams and Veuncil Powell from the jury panel. As to venireperson Sadowski, the relevant portions of the voir dire are as follows:
dd2b598166