Inregards to the romans is this another word for Europe in general? The Europeans do seem to be good the poor and weak with their welfare system. Europeans do seem to be good to the filthy as they are quite sexually liberal. Also their rulers seem to not have too much power because of democracy.
On the flip side Europeans may not be romans because a lot of Europeans are non religious, some even identify as having no religion, atheist, agnostic etc. instead of Christian.
If Europeans are indeed romans does this mean the great battle will be fought between Europeans who practice secularism as opposed to Muslims who practice sharia law?
True, they are not religious in general but Western world is fast changing with the far right coming in power in some countries while they are a very close second in others. The left leaning politicians and parties have a very close competition with the right and the right may eventually win over them before they assemble for the big war.
It is about numerical superiority. Weight and influence does not make sense or fit into any place at all. Wars will take place and events will occur to cause them to be the majority of the world population.
This is wrong. Russia is not communist anymore. Since the era of his leadership, Putin has managed to bring back Orthodox Christianity as important values among the Russians. You can actually find more atheists in the US or Europe. Especially Europe. Russia today is actually more religious than the US and Europe.
So, it is 100% correct to say that the word Roman used in the Quran and the Hadith refer exclusively to the Byzantine whose capital was at Constantinople. When it felled to the Muslims in 1453 AD, the administration and the Church were taken to Russia by the Romanov family.
Thanks for the comment. Yes, the eastern part of the Roman Empire came to be known as the Byzantine Empire and the passage from Hugh N. Kennedy is there in the piece above to support this as well. Unfortunately, some people are deceived into thinking that the Byzantium was outside of Europe. No mental gymnastics can transfer Rome from Europe to Russia which some have been desperately attempting to do. Playing the creed card is one way that has been used to push forward the Russian agenda but a detailed study of it also informs us that the forced Russian connection there does not stand. The Roman Empire was a geographical area and not a religious one and bringing in the orthodox card does not help. Even if one goes with it, the area of this later Roman Empire would still be Eastern Europe and Greece and NOT Russia. I hope you had read the piece above ?
They will then fight. A third (of the Muslim army) will be defeated (& run away), and Allah will never forgive them. A third (of the Muslim army) will be killed and they will be regarded as the best martyrs in the eyes of Allah. A third (of the Muslim army) will conquer and they do not get affected by Fitna (tribulations). They will conquer Constantinople.
In conclusion we have seen the Saudi England truce in the past against the Ottomans and then Saudi Europe/USA truce against the Soviet Union and Iran also to this day Saudi Arabia is maintaining the Alliance with the United States and Europe. This is the truce prophesied by the prophet. Iran Russia are relentlessly trying to break this Arab Roman truce by orchestrating false flag operation against USA and Europe then blame it on Saudi Arabia. Imran Hussain identifies Russia as Romans. So, his conclusion will be the Russians and the Iranians are attacking Russia and the Shia city Al-Kufa in Iraq? The land of Turk is Russia and Kerman is in Iran. So according Imran Hussain Russian and the Muslims from Iran are attacking Russia and Iran. This hadis is talking about IRAN and another common enemy which must be Russia China or both. Now, according to Imran Hussain if Russia becomes the Roman and Iran become the Arabs then you can find in this prophesy that Iran and Russia are attacking Iran and Russia.
This link is more of a political piece than a religious one and not much to comment upon except the following:
Our first Islamic eschatological conclusion is that the coming Great War will result in the destruction of modern western civilization in such wise that what remains of the west after the Great War will play no further role in world affairs.
The West will actually bounce back from the devastation caused on them by Russia and the Sahabi was very surprised as to how this would happen but then he accepted it and narrated four good qualities of the Romans.
This is just crazy. Imran Nazar Hossein first changes the identity of the Romans and then gives a happy ending with the Russians whereas the Hadiths mention that after the Muslims and the Romans fight a joint war against Russia, they (the Muslims and the Romans) will confront each other in the greatest war the history has ever seen. Imran completely ignores these parts of the Hadiths and paints a rosy picture of a perfect Muslim-Russian unity.
In my view its just simple ,Romans means people inhabiting in the region of Capital Rome ,During Roman era the region under the empire was under the Capital Rome and under its rule/Obeying to the Capital Rome. But Now a days There is no Roman Empire but Rome Exists today as Rome city in Italy and many people/Nations Obey to it for one thing ie. to Roman Catholic church(& Vatican City).
Interesting prophectic times indeed.
Have you been paying attention?
The great monarch of catholic prophecy is already here.Born and bred in england!!!!
Not that the english will like him that much.
Aslamu Alaikum
mein is Hadith e Masumeen(a.s) Urdu Roman bahut khush hu
Kyunke me is Hadith e Masumeen(a.s) Urdu Roman se mein Apne Friends ku Daily sms kartu is se mere Friends ku bhi malumat hujati he
assalam allikum
Janab, mubariz khan saheb, allah aap ki umr daraz karen
aap ne allah rasull ;sll; aur unki aal,maa baap ke hukhuq
sare hadees pad kar amal karne wala zindagi me kabhi
dhoka nahi khaa sakta allah hum sab ko amal ki taufiq ata farmaye ameen, syed mukhtar ahmed
DOHA QATAR
3a8082e126