Giant Editor 9.0.4 Download
Daría Davino
I am brand new to using giants editor for FS22 and after watching the tutorial videos on how to use it, it seemed pretty straight forward but for some reason once I get the map up in editor I cannot navigate around it using WASD or any other way. Am I forgetting something or is this a known problem with GE?
Giant cell tumor of bones are usually located in the long tubular bones and rarely located in the proximal end of the radius. This is a case report of a giant cell tumor in the proximal radius in a 35-year-old woman treated successfully with curettage and bank bone graft.
An illustration to explain how the experiment was conducted will be useful. This has not been addressed in this revision.
Line 119: Please clarify what dimension does the diameter of the shell refer to? Is it the width of the entire animal?
Lines 141-142: Are these five sounds similar in pitch, amplitude, etc? While the sounds were randomly introduced, it would be good for Authors to add this detail on what makes these sounds different, or similar?
Lines 187-196: Thank you for clarifying that researchers were in-water (>1m away from the test clams) during the experiments. I strongly recommend Authors include these details here, as well as to explain how they had added a 60s buffer to acclimate giant clams to their presence.
Linea 181-182: Please add detail that these 16 events were taken out and not analysed subsequently.
Thank you for this intriguing work! It is great to read new autecology work for the giant clams, given the major assumption that these animals move very little. Overall, I have great reservations on the experimental design, thus the outcomes of the study may not be representative of the actual treatments. I hope that the authors can supplement more information regarding their experimental process (e.g. to include an informative illustration on how the study was conducted) and clarifications of the steps, so that a better assessment of the results can be made. A more general comment is the mantle retractions here was definitively placed as an anti-predator behaviour, but it is not precise as the behaviour can also refer to others such as clearance of debris and sediments, or macro-fauna present on their mantles. While the study is designed with anti-predator avoidance, the context should be broadened to acknowledge the other possibilities.
Some methods should be described in more details, for instance, how long were the video recordings, what time was the video recording done, how far were the giant clam individuals from each other. Please see attachment for additional comments and suggestions.
Determining the composition of giant exoplanets is crucial for understanding their origin and evolution. However, planetary bulk composition is not measured directly but must be deduced from a combination of mass-radius measurements, knowledge of the planetary age and evolution simulations. Accurate determinations of stellar ages, mass-radius measurements, and atmospheric compositions from upcoming missions can significantly improve the determination of the heavy-element mass in giant planets. In this paper we first demonstrate the importance of an accurate age measurement, as expected from Plato, in constraining planetary properties. Well-determined stellar ages can reduce the bulk-metallicity uncertainty by up to a factor of two. We next infer the bulk metallicity of warm giants from the Ariel mission reference sample and identify the Ariel high-priority targets for which a measured atmospheric metallicity can clearly break the degeneracy in the inferred composition. We show that knowledge of the atmospheric metallicity can broadly reduce the bulk-metallicity uncertainty by a factor of four to eight. We conclude that accurate age determinations from Plato and atmospheric measurements by Ariel and the James Webb Space Telescope will play a key role in revealing the composition of giant exoplanets.
ffe2fad269