Are these crapome?
Josh Yu
Eric Deutsch
Hi Josh, yes. The ‘sp’ stands for Swiss-Prot. These are the Swiss-Prot identifiers for the common contaminants in samples. Of course, if your sample was a human sample, some of the human proteins may be legitimately in your sample not because of contamination, but it’s hard to know.
Note that strictly “CRAPome” (https://www.crapome.org/) is different than cRAP.fasta.
Regards,
Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/324286e4-6ef8-4535-936c-510946de3e09o%40googlegroups.com.
Josh Yu
On Friday, July 24, 2020 at 1:57:18 AM UTC-4, Eric Deutsch wrote:
Hi Josh, yes. The ‘sp’ stands for Swiss-Prot. These are the Swiss-Prot identifiers for the common contaminants in samples. Of course, if your sample was a human sample, some of the human proteins may be legitimately in your sample not because of contamination, but it’s hard to know.
Note that strictly “CRAPome” (https://www.crapome.org/) is different than cRAP.fasta.
Regards,
Eric
From: spctools...@googlegroups.com <spctools...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Josh Yu
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 7:07 PM
To: spctools-discuss <spctools...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [spctools-discuss] Are these crapome?
Hi All,
I used crap.fasta trying to identify possible contaminants in my proteomics analysis, and here's the result. Are these "sp" proteins contaminants?
Thanks,
Josh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.