Is Spark Java project active or dying ?

428 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael B

unread,
Sep 23, 2016, 11:33:14 PM9/23/16
to sparkjava
Hello community,

I like the framework and our team uses it in one of the production modules, but we're noticing that most fresh questions in this forum are simply not even answered and development on GitHub does not show any activity.

Is this  project even active? What are the plans for future releases? It is really important to understand the state of the project when we use it for production environment.

Thanks.

David (Spark Team)

unread,
Nov 4, 2016, 5:05:19 PM11/4/16
to sparkjava
Not as active as we would like, but not dying. We just merged a bunch of PRs yesterday. Not a lot of people use these forums though.

Wilson MacGyver

unread,
Nov 4, 2016, 7:14:45 PM11/4/16
to David (Spark Team), sparkjava
since the forum is not very active. what is a good place for spark discussion? twitter? slack? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sparkjava" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparkjava+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.

Justin

unread,
Nov 7, 2016, 2:04:55 PM11/7/16
to sparkjava, david.misl...@gmail.com
Would also like to know the best place for Spark discussion!


On Friday, November 4, 2016 at 4:14:45 PM UTC-7, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
since the forum is not very active. what is a good place for spark discussion? twitter? slack? 
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:05 PM, David (Spark Team) <david.misl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Not as active as we would like, but not dying. We just merged a bunch of PRs yesterday. Not a lot of people use these forums though.


On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 5:33:14 AM UTC+2, Michael B wrote:
Hello community,

I like the framework and our team uses it in one of the production modules, but we're noticing that most fresh questions in this forum are simply not even answered and development on GitHub does not show any activity.

Is this  project even active? What are the plans for future releases? It is really important to understand the state of the project when we use it for production environment.

Thanks.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sparkjava" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sparkjava+...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Gerrick Bivins

unread,
Nov 14, 2016, 7:05:51 PM11/14/16
to sparkjava
Me as well. Is it happening more on GitHub?

Per Wendel

unread,
Nov 16, 2016, 6:42:14 AM11/16/16
to sparkjava
It's pretty active, We did a 2.5.2 release a week ago the contained an important security fix and we plan to release 2.5.3 this week. However, the forum is somewhat not as active as we want. The Spark team (which is basically me and David) don't have the bandwith to both maintain the project and be active in all forum threads and were hoping that the community would be active enough to "handle that".
 
Perhaps Google Groups is not the correct forum. Github is primarily for posting issues and feature requests (and Pull requests). 

Ideas are welcome, maybe slack is a good idea. Maybe something else.

Cheers,
Per

On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 5:33:14 AM UTC+2, Michael B wrote:
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Philippe Charrière

unread,
Nov 16, 2016, 10:43:07 PM11/16/16
to sparkjava
Hi
perhaps you can create a sister repository to handle the discussion, some tips, ... issues are very useful for that. You stay in the GitHub application, it's easy to switch to SparkJava repository, etc...

Christian MICHON

unread,
Nov 17, 2016, 3:48:30 AM11/17/16
to sparkjava
I would suggest to have at least on this group the announcements and changelog for any new release. I wasn't aware of 2.5.2 until I stumbled on it by accident (before your email).

This should ensure the project is very much alive.


On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 12:42:14 PM UTC+1, Per Wendel wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages