Space Elevator Journal Update

[Space Elevator Journal]

Space Elevator Journal Update

• Radioactive Space Debris Re-enters Atmosphere

  Posted: 08 Jan 2007 03:30 PM CST

  [Author's Note: This posts documents three cases of nuclear power supplies on spacecraft whose orbit decayed. At this time I don't have any hard information about the size of the nuclear power supplies, radioactivity levels or expert opinion on any environmental damage. --PB--]
  
  
  Sometimes nuclear power is the only source of long-term power stable enough to drive spacecraft and/or their onboard experiments. That may seem to be funny thing to put at the top of a post about nuclear mishaps but the point I'm trying to make is that nuclear power supplies will likely be a growing reality in space. Space debris isn't an issue only spacers need to worry about. It has and can continue to have an impact down here on the surface.
  
  On December 12, 1959, quickly following the 1957 launch of Sputnik, the United Nations (UN) General Assembly adopted Resolution 1472 (XVI) - International Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space beginning with the following laudable sentiments;
  
  

  "The General Assembly,

  Recognizing the common interest of mankind as a whole in furthering the peaceful use of outer space,

  Believing that the exploration and use of outer space should be only for the betterment of mankind and to the benefit of States irrespective of the stage of their economic or scientific development,

  Desiring to avoid the extension of present national rivalries into this new field,

  Recognizing the great importance of international cooperation in the exploration and exploitation of outer space for peaceful purposes,

  Noting the continuing programmes of scientific cooperation in the exploration of outer space being undertaken by the international scientific community,

  Believing also that the United Nations should promote international co-operation in the peaceful uses of outer space,"

  This resolution calls for reports from the Committee for Peaceful Uses of Outer Space which is overseen by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) which, along with other programs, maintains the Register of Objects Launched into Outer Space.
  
  The register has a searchable index. Setting the search form to 'Uses Nuclear Power Source: Yes' and clicking the search button shows a list of the 62 objects shot into space with nuclear power sources aboard.
  
  Adding 'Presently in Space: No' reduces the results to 11 objects, two of which are on Mars and six are listed as recovered . The remaining three suffered orbital decay, one of which burned up completely in Earth's atmosphere another burned partially spewing 'fragments' into the Pacific Ocean and a third sprayed radioactive debris across thousands of square miles of Canada.
  
  The registration report dated May 23, 1997, describes, in dry, technocratic tones, the demise of Mars-96. The spacecraft, launched November 16, 1996 from the Baikonur launch site by a Proton carrier rocket on a mission to do a global study of the surface of the planet Mars and its internal structure and surrounding plasma, carried a Pu-238 RTG power supply.
  
  "Transfer of the unmanned interplanetary station Mars-96 from artificial Earth satellite orbit to flight path to the planet Mars did not take place The Mars-96 station entered the dense layers of the atmosphere and broke up, with individual fragments falling into the water areas of the Pacific Ocean" [emphasis added]
  
  
  

  In an abstract from a 1991 study entitled Potential health risks from postulated accidents involving the Pu-238 RTG (Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator) on the Ulysses solar exploration mission the four authors (Goldman, M.; Nelson, R. C.; Bollinger, L.; Hoover, M. D. from the Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Inst. of Albuquerque, NM) had this to say.
  
  "Potential radiation impacts from launch of the Ulysses solar exploration experiment were evaluated using eight postulated accident scenarios. Lifetime individual dose estimates rarely exceeded 1 mrem. Most of the potential health effects would come from inhalation exposures immediately after an accident, rather than from ingestion of contaminated food or water, or from inhalation of resuspended plutonium from contaminated ground. For local Florida accidents (that is, during the first minute after launch), an average source term accident was estimated to cause a total added cancer risk of up to 0.2 deaths. For accidents at later times after launch, a worldwide cancer risk of up to three cases was calculated (with a four in a million probability). Upper bound estimates were calculated to be about 10 times higher."

  
  Cosmos 1402, another nuclear accident in the sky carrying a BOUK, described by the State Research Center of Russian Federation Institute of Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE) as "a small fast neutron reactor and remote thermoelectric generator based on semiconductors", launched Aug. 30, 1982. While the IPPE site says "more than 30 BOUK units were in operation on the board of the Cosmos spacecraft for a number of years" and there's nothing pointing to the reactor as the source of failure, Cosmos 1402 only lasted little more than 5 months.
  
  

  Source: UNOOSA report from USSR dated Feb.9,1983
  

  
  Cosmos 954, launched Sept. 18, 1977 and also carrying a BOUK, crashed to the ground on Jan. 24, 1978 in northern Canada spreading radioactive debris over a wide swath of remote territory south and east of Great Slave Lake in Canada's Northwest Territories (Google map of approximate location).
  
  
  

  It wasn't until May 1978 that Academician B. N. Petrov, the Deputy Chairman of the Intercosmos Council off the USSR Academy of Sciences, officially acknowledged the end of Cosmos 954's short ride in the middle of a list of eight other space objects that also 'ceased to exist'.
  

  
  

  
  In his report of December 22, 1978, the Permanent Representative of Canada notified UNOOSA that the search for the scattered remains of Cosmos 954 had ended. The details of the recovery of a number of parts emitting "man-made radiation" included;
  

  • 6 beryllium cylinders approximately 10 cm. diameter x 25 cm. long
    
  • 41 beryllium rods approximately 10 cm. long x 2.5 cm. [diameter]
  • 1 piece of "sheath-like material"
  • 18 small flakes, slivers and chunks
  • 1 metallic cylinder approximately 51 cm. max length x 36 cm. diameter with a 2.5 mm. thick wall

  Source: Note Verbale from Canada to UNOOSA Dec. 19, 1978
  
  

  
  
  

  
  

  ---

  
  
  
  

  

Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner

You are subscribed to email updates from Space Elevator Journal
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.

If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: Space Elevator Journal, c/o FeedBurner, 549 W Randolph, Chicago IL USA 60661

[Space Elevator Journal]

Space Elevator Journal Update

• NOVA: Space Elevator - Cheaper, Safer Than Rockets?

  Posted: 11 Jan 2007 02:50 AM CST

  The NOVA scienceNOW segment on the space elevator that aired on Tuesday (January 9, 2007) is an excellent introductory explanation of what a space elevator is, carbon nanotubes, beamed power and the challenges involved in making it all come together.
  
  My favourite quote was Neil de Grasse Tyson saying "A space Elevator can be cheaper and safer than rockets - giving routine access to the solar system."
  
  See the 12-minute broadcast segment via:
  
  

  QuickTime high | low RealVideo high | low Windows Media high | low
  

  
  Liftport didn't get mentioned in the broadcast (even though Liftport Sysadmin Brian "Kilroy" Dunbar claims the elevator doors that close on Neil de Grasse Tyson in the intro are theirs) but they were well covered in a video extra as per this SpaceLF8R Journal post: Space Elevator Segment on NOVA scienceNOW (PBS)
  
  Dr. Edwards made a brief appearance on the space elevator segment and provided answers for the Why Build IT? flash extra on the NOVA site. He is cited as being from something called Black Line Ascension. He did hint in an earlier comment on the SpaceLF8R Journal that something new was up. Stay tuned.

• 

[Space Elevator Journal]

Space Elevator Journal Update

• Designing the Orbital Space Tourism Experience

  Posted: 17 Jan 2007 09:50 AM CST

  Some people like art or cars. Techno-journalists are info-geeks who get excited about well-designed web sites engorged with hard information. Couple that with the desire to write about things that will happen after the space elevator is built like space tourism and solar-power satellites and the Space Future (SF) site is pure info-porn.
  
  In a kind of logical mobius strip SF credits its own commercial consulting arm, Space Future Consulting with its genesis. In any case, it is the work of some well-ordered minds who have laid out a smörgåsbord of articles and studies about space habitat and tourism, space vehicles and space power generation.
  
  Among those is the article mentioned in title from Spaceport Associates' Derek Webber laying out the principal parameters of a successful space tourism venture.
  
  Webber posits that "the average potential orbital space tourist is probably male, aged mid fifties, and works full time even though being worth at least $200M" who will book his trip with a specialist space agency on a polar orbit that will provide the most diverse view of terrestrial features.
  
  The article covers the potential medical, technical and human aspects of pre-flight, on-orbit and return phases of the journey.
  
  Webber assumes orbit will be achieved by conventional rockets or space planes with no consideration given to a space elevator.
  
  --PB--
  

•