sp-discuss-group

Hi Team, I try to get a Chrome extension that changes the country in which my browser appears. I need

Martin, Somehow I have not read this. The main problem of these patterns is that it is not a good

Hi all, I've just spotted that the proposal for messaging protocol on top of WebSockets have been

Hi Paul, >> Not really. The problem I was alluding to is preventing clashes. UUID >>

On 19 October 2011 08:22, Marvin Thielk <thi...@google.com> wrote: > sp as in security

Hi Ilya, > I see that this discussion is getting away from the problem, thought there had >

On 10/03/2011 03:21 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Martin Sustrik

On 10/02/2011 03:37 PM, Paul Colomiets wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Martin Sustrik<

On 09/30/2011 06:33 PM, Ben Kloosterman wrote: > However, after speaking to IETF folks I've

Hi Sanjay, > I've been extremely busy over the last month at work and I'm just >

Hi all, I've been quite busy lately with other stuff thus falling behind the SP discussion.

Yes, I think it will really help us to look at this. Also take a look at the following presentation

Hi Gary, Sory for the delay. I've been doing some consulting and had no time for the SP work.

Hi all, What follows are some thought on SP running on top of WebSocket protocol as defined here:

On 08/26/2011 11:21 PM, Paul Colomiets wrote: > We used to have several broker-like instances

Hi all, To make the discussion more clear, I though it would make sense to represent the layering in

On 08/10/2011 05:00 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > IMO the motivations are always economic. The

Just to be clear, OpenFlow is an implementation aspect of the broader goal of Software Defined

Hi Andrew, > A "store" is based on probability models of durability for data given >

On 7/22/11 11:48 AM, "Martin Sustrik" <sus...@250bpm.com> wrote: >On 07/22/2011

Hi all, This email is to follow the recent pub/sub discussion, as an argument for end-to-end

Sorry for the late reply, was busy with some stuff. Yes, you're right about the point on TCP (the

Better description of what MS AppFabric can do: http://convective.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/windows-

On 28 June 2011 04:51, Martin Sustrik <sus...@250bpm.com> wrote: 1. Filtering criteria stored

Hi Gary, > I can donate a WebEx session for the event for those who can't make it. Thanks!

On 05/24/2011 08:14 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > The 20 bytes used in 0MQ seems excessive. At any

Hi Artur, Andrew, > I think you are on the right track. Many papers on this topic don't >

On 05/20/2011 09:06 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Is there any IETF policy on keeping semi-

On 05/17/2011 11:06 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote: > The only reason I can think of is that the MTU

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Paul Colomiets <pa...@colomiets.name> wrote: > > > On