After the rites at Stonehenge and Oxford comes mediation.

[Karen Holmes (Suzeranda)]

Each nation has a national or cultural way of resolving disputes, but
there is no globally-recognized court system at present that will
handle disputes between nations. We recommend, therefore, a mediation
process to end the conflict in Iraq, and then the creation of a court
system to adjudicate this dispute and all future disputes between
nations.

Our organization has a plan to mediate the dispute between the United
States and Iraq to end the conflict, but we do not have the power or
the right to judge. We will offer our services to mediate, and then
will go to an objective third nation to introduce the principles of
our proposed Local court system--how the international government will
handle disputes. You can watch these principles in action prior to the
creation of the proposed international government.

In the mediation, our organization will draw together President Bush
and his advisors who advocated the preemptive strike on Iraq to meet
with the highest surviving ranking members of the Baath Party under
Saddam Hussein, and we will help to find a middle ground between the
two sides. Following the mediation, both sides will have approximately
one year to prepare their cases. During that time, our organization
will work with an objective third nation to create the Local court,
which will judge this dispute.

Why would President Bush be willing to do this? His policies resulted
in the loss of power and prestige for himself and the United States.
Power comes not from money or position, but from assuming
responsibility to undo the damage you have done, and you rise and fall
in power by the choices you make. We can use this crisis to set the
stage for world peace.

Karen Holmes,
Principal