Hi All:
The manner the RWA has been formed, its formation communicated and no mandate listed of its selected members - remains a lot to be desired and say a lot about the professionalism and the real intent of 'THE VATIKA GROUP'. I believe the founders of Vatika City had a vision of creating a great community, mean well and wanted to hand over the running of the society to an able body as they were believers of the project. What it turns out to be a bunch of liars, who have absolutely no ethics and would do anything to get their way.
Nothing against the folks who are the supposedly the RWA - do they know what they have signed up for? Do they know what bylaws will govern them? What is the period they are RWA for? What is the expectations of them? I hope they have answers to all these questions and more that other fellow residents will have of them.
So we all know, there were a bunch of us contacted by Vatika group - to blindly sign off a document and be the RWA. These folks had the following DISAGREEMENT and refused to be the RWA ---
1. These individuals refused to sign on a document that stated that these individuals were 'ELECTED' and preferred to be called 'SELECTED', as that was exactly what it was. They were selected by Vatika group, if at all.
2. They did not want to be registered under the societies act and wanted to be registered under the home owners act as being under the home owners act provides lot more authority to the residents and limits the power of the builder.
3. They wanted to be called the 'Interim RWA' as opposed to 'RWA'. The reason they wanted to be called the 'Interim RWA' because they believed that the role of the 'Interim RWA' was only to conduct 'FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS' within 90 days and not take over the responsibilities that the builder had to perform before they left the society.
4. The elected RWA would then deal with the builder in taking over the society - and hold the builder accountable.
Of course, the Vatika group did not like to be held accountable and have chosen to create their own RWA of gullible individuals. They have done so by endangering the lives of these few individuals for their own benefit. For this act, even the fellow residents who are now the RWA should understand the PLOY and RESIGN.
Given this grave situation, we should meet on Sunday in the main club at 10 AM as proposed. The agenda should be the following:
1. The 7 members who are the RWA should show-up and give their perspective of what was their intent of accepting the role