If you are out there -in a city larger than 1,000 people, the odds are that you have an ex-special forces of some kind or another in your local population. I have known many of them -I cultivated friendships with them to learn from them.
I say this to point out the fragility of the Grid and amenities and utilities that you take for granted. It will not take what you think of as a terrorist
to take your precious comfortable utilities away from you -Water, Power, Heating fuels, communications, sanitation, etc...
Here is my point:
My family lived with a Green Beret in Kansas in a town of only 200 people. Three tours in Nam. SF Reserves his whole life.
He told me things that I have never repeated to anyone -too gross.
He was a Mad Dog of sorts...De Oppressor Liber meant something to him. He waged a war game against an active duty military unit. He used 100% civilians. He won. That was his job, his life.
My point? sorry...In that town of 200 in rural Kansas, had anything happened on a large scale, and there happened to be sent there some MJTF group, there would have been no water, and no power in the region. He said the first thing he would do if an "event" occurred, was to drop the water tower. I asked why.
"It keeps law enforcement busy,
and allows us to do what we have to -Wage War."
He passed away -from Cancer from Agent Orange
-as did thousands upon thousands of Vietnam Vets.
But...there are ex-SF everywhere. That is why the current powers that be would like to get rid of them -in fact, so far as I know, he was the last of his A-Team. The others were suckered into going to hunt down and kill "Bin Laden" after 9-11. They bought the idiotic story of
box- cutter toting terrorists hook line and sinker.
I never heard that he ever heard from them again, anyway.
He stayed back to take care of his 95 yo Mother (and us.:o)
war is about to cut loose on this nation. If you do not believe that, you are a fool. You will pay dearly. Your family may pay with far more than loss of possessions and homes. Hell is about to erupt here in this nation -on our soil. If you are so besotted with comfort that you are not aware of that, I pity you -I truly do.
If you understand a smidgin of what I have said, and what this article states...along with Judge Jeanine Pirro on ISIS, etc, etc, etc
-then please do something about it -right now -within an hour of reading this missive. Make plans. Figure out where to go. Get what you need to get there. Get with someone you trust. Ask advice. Do something, for...
"He Who Hesitates Is Lost."....
"He who has ears to hear, let him hear."
"Why do you speak to them in parables?"
He answered them, "To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but it is not given to them.
For
whoever has, to him will be given,
and he will have abundance, but
whoever doesn't have,
from him will be taken away even that which he
has.
Therefore I speak to them in parables,
because seeing they don't see, and hearing,
they don't hear, neither do they understand."
...Ever hear of the guy who says "the Lord
will save me" to the patrol car warning him of the flood coming, right?
Passes up that, the boat, and the helicopter with the same words, and
when he gets to heaven, complains;
"I told everyone you would save me."
"Hey, I sent you a car, a boat, a chopper, what do you want...?"
Same principle here. You can use three courses of action as believers; protest, flight, or fight. -In that order
Th e"fight" part will get bloody and deadly within seconds of a breakdown. It can be viewed as just be killed - or martyred),
and I see a difference between the two. Martyrdom is the highest honor
for a believer.
However, an invading army is not going to care what we
believe before raping our women to death,
cutting off heads, sticking
them on bayonets, and eating our children. We can still protest, but
it is pretty much too late, and the time for flight is almost gone
also.
If one wishes not to take up arms, I would suggest being in an
area where it will most likely not be necessary.
I see our biggest jobs here in the OzArk Plateau being
to be raising food, building homes, and caring for the sick and wounded.
We need massive amounts of help. On that I agree with Ken. HOWEVER,
while I do not see any "armed camps" around here,
when "it happens" ,
there will be an absolute necessity to make the areas of refuge exactly
that;
places of safety. Internal cancer is just as deadly as an external
knife thrust.
There will be trash to be taken out. That will become
clear in time; to some sooner, to others later, but at a much higher
cost.
The cost will be in the comfort, health, and lives of family,
friends, and loved ones. "He who hesitates is lost," is another
way of saying, do something, right or wrong, do not sit on the fence, do
not be lukewarm, or as George Patton said;
"An imperfect battle plan put
into action today,
is better than a perfect one put into action
tomorrow." Plan on helping in some way, radio communication,
nursing, gardening, or watching and praying; but act.
Act now; do not
sit & fiddle while Rome burns. I am reminded of Jim Elliot's words as well in closing;
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot
lose."
That is not just "giving up your life" as a martyr.
Instead, Try giving up
your insurance, your worthless house...
-if you owe more than you can
easily pay off very quickly, it is beyond worthless...
-it is a millstone
around your neck. Give up your comforts, your pleasures. If you do not do this now, you (millions of Americans will, although you may escape) may well give up your life -willingly in defense of others...
-or unwillingly under extreme torture and agony that a million Americans could never imagine with their cumulative minds.
Do something
real. There are so many people here who have give up almost every
comfort, just to be ready to help when "they" come -meaning refugees with the shirt on their back and nothing more than the skills they have in their hands and the knowledge they have in their minds...
I was at one
community, talking to Brother Thomas about getting bunches of camping
tents, etc for people to live in year round, and he said, "Brother Jerry i don't
know when they are going to come, but I know people will be living in
tents"... I laughed and said; ""they" are here, hello? you are living in
a tent." He said, I mean HAVE to live in a tent. He was so focused on "worrying" about the poor folks gonna
have to live in a tent through the winter that, he did not even think
of the fact that he was doing that very thing. He and I have been waiting for ten years now for y'all to show up...
-There is a word for that;
altruism; doing good for others, at your own expense.
Many of us have
been doing that for 30 years now.
Brother Thomas is waiting; I am
waiting; someday soon, some good help will show up.
Some of you won't make it. It will not be my fault - We sent a car, a boat and a chopper.............
"Let's just Make it count, Jed....."
This is Jerry Diamond. If you're listening to this, you are the Remnant.
Top cybersecurity experts echoed a dire warning from the NSA on the vulnerability of the U.S. power grid, with one telling FoxNews.com that state-sponsored hackers ...
Experts say the U.S. power grid is vulnerable to an attack. (The Associated Press)
Top cybersecurity experts echoed a dire warning from a top
intelligence chief on the vulnerability of the U.S. power grid, with one
telling FoxNews.com that state-sponsored hackers could send America’s
nerve centers on an “uncontrollable, downward spiral.”
Admiral Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency and
commander of the U.S. Cyber Command, told lawmakers Thursday that
adversaries of the U.S. conduct regular electronic reconnaissance to
reveal weaknesses in America’s industrial control systems, ranging from
power plants to sewage facilities. The nation's entire power
infrastructure could prove vulnerable to a crippling assault, should
China or any of the other nations who sponsor such efforts find an
Achilles' heel and move to exploit it, he said.
Rogers was not exaggerating, according to experts.
“Unlike the recent headline attacks, which result in significant loss
of data, attacking a nation state’s critical infrastructure requires
persistence and long term discipline of not being detected. The scale
and techniques required to do this exist in the military and
intelligence functions of various world governments,” said Ron Gula, CEO
of Columbia, Md.,-based Tenable Network Security.
Rogers told members of the House Intelligence Committee China along
with “one or two” other countries have the capability to mount
devastating cyber-attacks, and merely remaining on the defensive is a
“losing strategy.” The possibility of such cyberattacks by U.S.
adversaries has been widely known, but never confirmed publicly by the
nation's top cyber official.
Admiral
Michael Rogers, who heads the NSA, warned lawmakers that the U.S. must
go on the offensive to avoid a crippling cyber-attack.
Brian Ingram, cyber security investigator and owner of Consulting
Investigation Services, headquartered in Dallas, called the assessment
“dead on accurate.”
“China has, for years, participated in massive electronic probing of
networks in the U.S.,” Ingram said. “The ability to conduct these
network scans is not new, the sophistication of the newer methodologies
is growing exponentially and our defenses, from the little made public
or known to those in the industry, has not kept pace.”
There is a "huge risk" that America's own power utilities could be
turned into a weapon used against U.S. citizens and controlled from
another land, said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon
Institute.
“While security has improved substantially, there is no way, none at all, to prevent an attack.”
- Paul Rosenzweig, Heritage Foundation
“We could lose the ability to control our power systems," said
Ponemon, whose organization is based in Traverse City, Mich. "If this
happens with a nuclear power facility, the attack could cause a melt
down or explosions, cause considerable damage for people at or near the
plant, and put it out of commission for many, many months.”
The U.S. and Israel are believed to have mounted just such an attack
on Iran's nuclear weapons program, Ponemon noted, referring to the
engineered computer virus known as Stuxnet that was discovered in 2010.
The attack, delivered by an infected thumb drive, targeted Iran's Natanz
nuclear facility, and is believed to have shut down some one-fifth of
Iran’s nuclear centrifuges. The virus was used to obtain information on
the nuclear facility and put pressure on centrifuges, causing them to
spin out of control.
Paul Rosenzweig, visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said
experts have known for a long time that an even more devastating and
costly attack could be mounted on the U.S., where the power grid is a
vast complex of public and private infrastructure.
“While security has improved substantially, there is no way, none at all, to prevent an attack,” Rosenzweig said.
The private sector has cooperated with the U.S. government for years
to share information and increase the ability to defend itself from
cyber attacks, Gula said. However, this is a growing challenge.
“The problem is the attack surface is so large that we are constantly
reacting to moves made by our potential adversaries,” Gula says.
Network security is much like airline or automobile safety, Gula
explained. Government regulations, technology breakthroughs from
industry and development of best practices will minimize the threat to
the energy infrastructure, but there is no one entity responsible for
this, he said.
A cyber attack on Iran's nuclear program proved devastating in 2010. (Fox News)
“Private industries should be expected to defend themselves from less
skilled hackers, corporate espionage and maintain a network compliant
with their industry’s regulations. They should also expect to work with
the various U.S. government groups to share information and respond to
nation-state attacks,” Gula said.
For now, the best protection the U.S. has is its economic ties to
China - and the fact that America could answer an attack with one of its
own - the strategy known in the Cold War as "mutually assured
destruction."
“What would China would gain from turning off Los Angeles and why
would China do that in light of its investment in the U.S. and the
possibility that the U.S. could reciprocally turning off Beijing?”
Rosenzweig asked, before cautioning that America’s vulnerability would
become relevant if there was a major conflict with China.
There is a general sense the U.S. faces more of a threat from
irrational actors, such as smaller nations and independent terrorist
groups, who probably don’t have capabilities now, but could at some
point in the future, Rosenzweig said.
If and when committed enemies of the U.S. gain the ability to strike,
America's dependence on its power grid could prove to be a fatal
weakness..
“Can you plan anything in the electronic age if you can’t rely on the
power grid?" Ingram asked. "Financial exchanges, eCommerce, banking,
medical records, postal/mail delivery, trucking, railways…all of them
are interconnected in our society and the ability to protect that, to
ensure that our way of life is not dependent on a foreign power’s
benevolence is vital to have a thriving and prosperous U.S.”
jerry diamond
unread,
Nov 22, 2014, 3:59:40 AM11/22/14
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message