I understand that this parking issue may be a hard selling point to
the community, but, truly, with this argument, aren't we missing the
point of having a street car in the first place? From my point of
view, having a street car line should limit the amount of driving
people need/want to do. In order to advance to a more eco-friendly and
population friendly place, limiting cars is a necessity, so why is
creating MORE parking one of the main points on the agenda?
I agree that parking during construction is a concern for businesses
on Hawthorne, but aside from that, Hawthorne residents need to suck it
up. I live at 31st and Hawthorne, right down the street from the
Hostel, no less, and there is ALWAYS plenty of on street parking. In
addition, there are at least two flexcars within a three block radius,
if I have a burning need to drive, which I seldom do.
Didn't we discuss that the Portland Plan is attempting to push the 20
minute city? Limiting car use and creating tranist friendly corridors
are ways for this to work while benefiting the community and the
earth. I don't see the logic is continuing to push an outdated mode of
travel. Hopefully, the time of 2+ cars per family and driving to most
destinations will soon become a thing of the past.
One more point - if parking did become such a problem (which I hope it
doesn't), couldn't we create a permit system for Hawthorne residents?
In denser cities where parking truly is limited, permits serve to
ensure residents are treated with priority when it comes to parking.
As for commuters driving to Hawthorne to park and ride the street car
- aren't we planning transportation hubs? It is a wise move to have
parking at major hubs to encourage people to drive to these places
instead of randomly choosing a street car stop in a place where it is
likely to disrupt the neighborhood.
Just some thoughts . . . thanks!