Hello neighbors-
I'm just sending out some takeaways from last Thursday's DEQ hearing on the draft H&V air permit, for those who couldn't attend, and a reminder for written comments by the August 4th deadline.
Notes from hearing
-Even
though the citizen land use (LUBA) appeals could pause or halt the DEQ
permitting process, DEQ is proceeding with the Public Hearing &
Comment Period because there is an Oregon Administrative Rule that
allows them to
-The increased CO levels are
the trigger for the higher class EPA Title V permit that H&V must
apply for. DEQ reported that measured/modeled CO levels near the plant
were below public health safety thresholds
-There
is still a lot of uncertainty about the fine particulates, PM <2.5,
that are being emitted from H&V. There is some averaging of
particulate sizes and possible shell-gaming between plants that may hide
the true emissions of fine particulates that are among the highest
concern for public health. EPA
classifies glass microfibers as a Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) when <1.0 micron in diameter, which is the size produced at the Glass
Fiber 1 plant (near Crystal Lake park entrance). However, because DEQ allows the both H&V plants to be
considered one facility, the average size emitted is larger than 1.0,
and so escapes additional regulation. DEQ allows H&V to keep the details of the fiber size of their glass fiber emissions confidential.
-The
Cleaner Air Oregon program that H&V has been called into will be
doing testing on fine particulates, and results are anticipated in a
year or so
-Several neighbors had thoughtful
questions and comments on the historical context of neighborhood
concerns and zoning history, conflicts with the City's land use
approval, and the need to slow down the permitting process
Given
the pending citizen land use appeal, the unknowns with particulate
levels, and the forthcoming Cleaner Air Oregon testing, we see a stronger
argument to postpone this public comment period to allow critical
information to come to light and allow for some community trust in this
process. Postponement would not limit H&V's ability to operate in
the meantime (they have been on a temporary permit since 2016).
Written comments can be submitted through 5pm, August 4th and made to:
Here is an updated list of potential talking points to add to your comments. Demanding detailed test results for particulates may be the most important appeal we can make:
- H&V recently installed a completely different filtration technology
to capture particulates. This equipment change and the public health risks
associated with fine particulates, especially PM < 2.5, demand rigorous
testing before approval of any new permit. H&V is too close to
neighborhoods, businesses, parks, and natural areas to proceed with
estimates and formulas.
- After all the community has been through with H&V and DEQ in the last 6 years, we deserve to see more emissions testing from both plants 1 and 2 to feel comfortable with any permitting process. The continued use of estimates/formulas without testing is not acceptable, and averaging / combining emissions - especially particulates - from the plants misrepresents actual pollutant risk for the community.
- H&V's proximity to sensitive neighbors and land uses, along with their
persistent air permit violation (that was in part due to an overreliance
on incorrect formulas), are why H&V is called into DEQ's Cleaner Air
Oregon program. The CAO program has planned particulate testing for
H&V, so why don't we just let CAO complete their testing/reporting before
proceeding with this permit process?
- The regulated pollutant levels in the draft permit are 3 times
higher than in the previous permit. This pollution increase is
unacceptable by our local land use code, and unacceptable for a polluter
with a history of negligence.
- It is not prudent for
DEQ to proceed with a public comment period while two citizen LUBA
appeals are pending. There is no need to rush this public comment
period, and doing so is not protective of public interest or health and
safety.
- The community has seen no accurate
emissions information from DEQ or H&V in the last 7 years. Even
DEQ's published reports contain erroneous/old formulas, how can we trust
DEQ when it has not been diligent with testing or transparent with
reporting?
- H&V's
negligence and old infrastructure continue to pose harm and risks to
our community and environment. H&V has had two river spills in the
last ten years, and they are also responsible for TCE soil contamination
clean-up.
- H&V has demonstrated irresponsibility
and negligence, while DEQ seems to be continuing with its 'honor system'
of pollution enforcement. If it wasn't for citizen outcry, DEQ would have
never discovered the gross persistent violation in 2015. This pattern
does not foster public trust.
- The draft permit
requests 74,000 tons/year of greenhouse gas emissions, an enormous amount that
conflicts with our City's Climate Action Plan