This is the third fire in Avery and Pioneer Park in the past several months. There were multiple fires at the BMX Park throughout 2020 and 2021. I have a feeling things will continue this way until we lose homes or most of the trees in on or more Parks. I rode home through Pioneer as far as the bridge where the path was blocked by a work vehicle presumably doing something related to the cable lines that run above the bridge. As I road through Avery Park on the other side, I noticed there were several vehicles from Peak and Pioneer ISPs working on the now-melted cable lines that provide internet throughout the mid-Valley. I wonder whether this will have an impact on internet service, since I heard that Peak may have been concerned about it. I also wonder whether there will be an impact to Vennel Farms' ability to use the rail line for transit, necessitating significantly increased truck traffic on 99.
It appeared to me that the City had cleaned up much of the campsites in Pioneer Park a few weeks ago. Over the winter I had already observed considerable destruction, and it became more clear once the City cleaned up the camps. City-owned culverts discharging directly to the Marys are filled with garbage, even after the cleanup. There are tire tracks cutting through large swaths of camas that predate this fire. I know that many such tracks have been left by service providers who I have seen handing out clothing and food in the park. There are numerous campsites along the banks where vegetation has been trampled or cut for firewood.
Along with others, working as part of a local group to identify homelessness solutions that are compatible with Southtown (e.g, permanent supportive housing, tiny homes, expansion of affordable housing through urban renewal, etc.) I provided testimony to the Council last year regarding the City's approach to addressing homelessness. Despite Council direction specifically recognizing that ecological impacts to parks required that campsites not be located in our parks continuously for more than a season at a time, as well as the general importance of geographic equity for making the challenge of unmanaged camping visible throughout Corvallis, AND the unsuitability of riparian corridors for unmanaged camping, the City has continued to hastily post camps in parks in north Corvallis that are not in riparian areas, while ignoring growing problems in the Mary's River corridor and other low income areas. This has concentrated unmanaged camping in our most valuable and vulnerable riparian areas. The City Manager specifically proposed to concentrate all unmanaged camping in Southtown last year and was rebuffed by the Council. He's figured out how to do that anyway. There are some camps in commercial areas of Northeast Corvallis as well, but seven out of nine Corvallis wards are basically insulated from ever seeing tents, thus allowing the City to continue to ignore the problem, occasionally posting tents and sending everyone to the BMX Park, then back to Pioneer, etc...
I'm frustrated that the City appears to continue to be ignoring these problems. I want them to really feel the pain of what a bad idea it is to continue to have uncontrolled burning, in the Mary's River corridor. But this same kind of fire has already happened twice since October very near to this area. I do not think they could get away with this in other areas of Corvallis. I don't see any reason why, after concentrating virtually all unmanaged camping south of Western and east of 26th for over two years, the City cannot act to do the same thing in Chintimini Park, Starker Arts Park, or Porter Park to give the Mary's River a break for a year or two. It seems fundamentally unfair to me the credulity and City staff time afforded to the Saving Open Spaces group's campaign against building market-rate housing on a monoculture of invasive blackberry, while protection of the most vulnerable open spaces we already have is totally and repeatedly ignored by City Staff, despite specific Council direction to prioritize these areas. I guess the answer is that those several people on Goldfinch have a land use attorney, while if you live in Twin Oaks, you do not have a right to expect responsiveness or consideration from your local government.
Maybe this will light a fire under the City and the County to actually establish an appropriate shelter site. I can't understand how it isn't obvious that the status quo carries substantially more cost and more risk, including in terms of the City's liability, than implementing a centralized, managed shelter option. Addressing problems in unmanaged camps eats up a tremendous amount of the City's resources. The City is relying on the County to take action, but they've accomplished basically nothing in four years. Now they're establishing an "office of homeless response"? How many beds can they fit in the office? In actuality, "The money is designated for program establishment, staffing and outreach over the course of two years." So expect more fires for at least two more years, I guess, since they have no plans to accomplish anything of substance.
I plan to renew my advocacy to the Council and the County commissioners that they take actions that allow the public to hold them accountable. If there is an elected or appointed official who believes that the best solution to homelessness is to allow unmanaged camping in the Mary's River corridor indefinitely, I want that person to have to say that in public, instead of hiding by avoiding taking official actions. If the status quo is to continue, I want to see motions, land use code changes, NEPA alternative evaluations, cost estimates, and amendments to the City's NPDES permits. All of that is required to authorize what the City has instead accomplished through deliberate, selective posting of campsites in Corvallis' high income wards and looking the other way in the Mary's River watershed.
Owen McMurtrey