False positive lombok:@UtilityClass

243 views
Skip to first unread message

al...@kudinov.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2016, 9:22:39 PM3/21/16
to SonarQube
@UtilityClass annotation eliminates no-args constructor, thus Utility classes should not have public constructors warning is irrelevant

Michael Gumowski

unread,
Mar 23, 2016, 11:29:59 AM3/23/16
to al...@kudinov.com, SonarQube
Hello Alex,

Thank you for your feedback, but as already discussed in this Pull Request, the Lombok annotation @UtilityClass is still an experimental feature, and thus subject to change. Consequently, we won't modify the behavior of the rule to handle it for the moment.

By the way, this is a community-based forum, and it is always appreciated that you say 'hi' and 'thanks' in your message.

Best regards,

Michael GUMOWSKI | SonarSource
Software Developer @ Language Team
http://sonarsource.com

On 22 March 2016 at 02:22, <al...@kudinov.com> wrote:
@UtilityClass annotation eliminates no-args constructor, thus Utility classes should not have public constructors warning is irrelevant

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SonarQube" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sonarqube+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sonarqube/091d82b2-8432-456c-84f5-0218d9974ed1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages