From what I've read this machine can only be netbooted with FreeBSD as
result of a SCSI problem.
Thing is - I know very little about netbooting, and I haven't been able
to find much out in the first place. All I seem to find are Redhat things.
So - I'm basically asking for someone to either help me step-by-step
and/or hold my hand thru netboot/netinstall. I'm clueless at this.
I have at my disposal a pair of x86 fBSD machines and my Slackware laptop.
Once the OS is installed... does it still need to be netboot?
Asking really nice!,
Myke
PS: If anyone needs to have an E450 disposed of, feel free to ship it to
me ;)
_______________________________________________
freebsd...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> I think so, since the SCSI controller isn't supported at all (as
> I understand the docs).
Actually, this changed very recently with Scott's import of the
esp(4) driver, ported from NetBSD.
regards,
--=20
wca
--0QFb0wBpEddLcDHQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAyLAbF47idPgWcsURAmpWAJ0U/4wdmwjyECfe0EUgI/cPaDyzjACePFQs
xnE+mhYeJLI/ZXFJjFWkRK8=
=HEeQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0QFb0wBpEddLcDHQ--
Will Andrews wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>
>
>>I think so, since the SCSI controller isn't supported at all (as
>>I understand the docs).
>>
>>
>
>Actually, this changed very recently with Scott's import of the
>esp(4) driver, ported from NetBSD.
>
>regards,
>
>
This /sounds/ encouraging to me, but does this just solve the
pre-install boot situation or the installation too?
Can you point me at an appropriate ISO with this fix? (or tell me which
version to look for)
Thanks
Myke
>Actually, this changed very recently with Scott's import of the
>esp(4) driver, ported from NetBSD.
Good news. This means that also my Ultra 1 is now supported (except
LANCE network card). In case some snapshot occurs I'll give it a try.
Regards,
G. Ardelean
> Good news. This means that also my Ultra 1 is now supported (except
> LANCE network card).
There used to be a lnc(4) driver in the tree... Yup, it's still
there, /sys/dev/lnc. Perhaps it could be taught to attach to your bus
system (Sbus, I suppose)?
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
joerg_...@interface-systems.de http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
> As Gheorghe Ardelean wrote:
>
> > Good news. This means that also my Ultra 1 is now supported (except
> > LANCE network card).
>
> There used to be a lnc(4) driver in the tree... Yup, it's still
> there, /sys/dev/lnc. Perhaps it could be taught to attach to your bus
> system (Sbus, I suppose)?
Yes we are missing the sbus frontend, but last time I've tried to use a
lnc card on i386 (AT-1500FT with PCnet-ISA II/AM79C961AKC) this was not
recognized at all. Indeed the chip is not in the list (if_lncvar.h) and I
had no idea how to add this chip also.
Regards,
Gheorghe Ardelean