with respect to 5.x, I did run 5.1 for a while, but 4.9 seemed to have
better performance for the stuff I tend to do (typically database / io
intensive), so would like to keep using 4.9 until the 5.x tree gets to a
similar level - however, I have not tried 5.2....so may be out of date
with my impression...:-)
> Which IRQ does uhci0 (or ohci0) get?
Think its uhci0 - and, err.. how do I tell which IRQ it gets ?
regards
Mark
_______________________________________________
freeb...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp...@freebsd.org"
(from messages)
May 12 23:31:43 istral /kernel.SMP: uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller>
port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 5 at device 7.2 on pci0
John Baldwin wrote:
>>>Which IRQ does uhci0 (or ohci0) get?
>>>
>>>
>>Think its uhci0 - and, err.. how do I tell which IRQ it gets ?
>>
>>
>
>dmesg | grep uhci0 should show that.
Well, that is probaby correct then and not the problem. I'm not sure what the
problem could be. Sorry. :(
--
John Baldwin <j...@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Thanks for your help!
Is there any way I can get the system to provide more info about what is
going on ?
regards
Mark
John Baldwin wrote:
>On Saturday 15 May 2004 12:10 am, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
>>Looks like IRQ 5 :
>>
>>(from messages)
>>May 12 23:31:43 istral /kernel.SMP: uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller>
>>port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 5 at device 7.2 on pci0
>>
>>
>
>Well, that is probaby correct then and not the problem. I'm not sure what the
>problem could be. Sorry. :(
>
>
>
Not that I know of. It sounds like a problem with the USB drivers. You can
try asking jul...@FreeBSD.org but he might be very busy.
--
John Baldwin <j...@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org