Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

RE: Question about cv_signal(9) (never mind)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

j...@polstra.com

unread,
Jun 12, 2004, 8:13:45 PM6/12/04
to
On 12-Jun-2004 John Polstra wrote:

> [Why does a caller to cv_signal(9) have to hold the associated mutex?]

Never mind. I understand now. It allows the implementation to
avoid doing any locking internally. That seems perfectly
reasonable, and I withdraw my question.

John
_______________________________________________
freeb...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp...@freebsd.org"

0 new messages