rsync or cvsup?

[d...@langille.org]

cvsup.nz.freebsd.org is being replaced. We are trying to set up the
new box now.

At present, it cvsup's from cvsup-master.freebsd.org. Is the latest
thinking to use rsync or cvsup?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/

_______________________________________________
freebs...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hubs...@freebsd.org"

[Peter_...@isc.org]

--Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 02 June 2004 05:23 am, Dan Langille wrote:

> At present, it cvsup's from cvsup-master.freebsd.org. Is the latest
> thinking to use rsync or cvsup?

CVSup - rsync is only used for legacy connections and is highly=20
discouraged (I was told when I set up cvsup4.us that each rsync=20
connection takes over 100M in RAM) I believe that ftp-master is =20
limited to 1 concurrent rsync connection just for that reason.

=2DPeter
=2D-=20
Peter_...@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow"

--Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAvf7cPtVx9OgEjQgRAjScAKDD/3XXckzFZAKdKWOlgeROLHKlSgCfT00v
RBUML6LCNMASbUFx5GRXGIE=
=I71R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_c7fvAQHkPBmAuUe--