"Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
Morley
Patrick Cracroft-Brennan wrote:
>
> In article <5idj1b$1...@news1.sol.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Olav_St=E5le_S=F8vi
> k_of_Camster?= <oso...@sn.no> writes
> >"Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
> >
<snip>
>
> Every time you post a message, it costs each and every one of us to
> download your message.
>
> In the case of UK readers, it's costing us all about 10p or 15p EACH to
> download EVERY one of your messages. <snip>
>
> Patrick Cracroft-Brennan
> Tel & Fax: +44 171 794 3833
> E-mail: p...@londwill.demon.co.uk
I think this is precisely the point of these postings. Do you think, as
I do, that perhaps it's a huge send up that some are taking seriously.
Best to let him have his warped fun and ignore him???
Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster
Louis Epstein
Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster (oso...@sn.no) wrote:
: l...@put.com (Louis Epstein) wrote:
:
: >Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster (oso...@sn.no) wrote:
: >: "Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
: >:
:
: >By courtesy as divorced wife of the peer,whose present wife is
: >"THE Countess of Snowdon"
: -Is there any difference if a noble man puts "The" infront of his
: title?
Typically it is omitted in addressing courtesy peers.
Lex
In article <WSbQjPAk...@londwill.demon.co.uk> Patrick Cracroft-Brennan <in...@londwill.demon.co.uk> writes:
>From: Patrick Cracroft-Brennan <in...@londwill.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: "Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
>Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 19:59:48 +0100
>For god sakes, Olav!! Why can't you do what everyone else does and GO
>AND LOOK IT UP IN A REFERENCE BOOK??????
>Every time you post a message, it costs each and every one of us to
>download your message.
>In the case of UK readers, it's costing us all about 10p or 15p EACH to
>download EVERY one of your messages. And why should I spend good, hard
>earned money to read a damn silly question as you've posted above????
>Olav, I am not saying that you should not ask questions, but you don't
>ask a panel of experts kindergarten type questions.
>
>Patrick Cracroft-Brennan
>Tel & Fax: +44 171 794 3833
>E-mail: p...@londwill.demon.co.uk
I guess that perhaps we here in the US have a better deal - it costs us
nothing to download a message.
A panel of distinguished experts would find it an honor to be able to answer
questions posed to them.
Lex
Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster
l...@put.com (Louis Epstein) wrote:
>Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster (oso...@sn.no) wrote:
>: "Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
>:
Louis Epstein
Patrick Cracroft-Brennan
In article <5idj1b$1...@news1.sol.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Olav_St=E5le_S=F8vi
k_of_Camster?= <oso...@sn.no> writes
>
Kelsoman
>In article <5idj1b$1...@news1.sol.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Olav_St=E5le_S=F8vi
>k_of_Camster?= <oso...@sn.no> writes
>>"Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
>>
>For god sakes, Olav!! Why can't you do what everyone else does and GO
>AND LOOK IT UP IN A REFERENCE BOOK??????
>
>Every time you post a message, it costs each and every one of us to
>download your message.
>
>In the case of UK readers, it's costing us all about 10p or 15p EACH to
>download EVERY one of your messages. And why should I spend good, hard
>earned money to read a damn silly question as you've posted above????
Oh my goodness....you are kidding me ? You have to pay for each
message ??????? Holy cow.......
Thank God I live in the "good ol' US of A" after hearing that.....
It's $ 19.95 a month + tax...unlimited use = $ 21.50 a month total !!
Love ua Patrick...how are you and Richard doing ?
hugz,
Kevin
Pamela Gray
Kelsoman wrote:
>
snip
>
> Oh my goodness....you are kidding me ? You have to pay for each
> message ??????? Holy cow.......
>
> Thank God I live in the "good ol' US of A" after hearing that.....
>
> It's $ 19.95 a month + tax...unlimited use = $ 21.50 a month total !!
>
their pricing policy; and telcos are getting sick of Internet users clogging
up their lines for sweet f.a. :->
Pamela
aly
Kelsoman wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 1997 19:59:48 +0100, Patrick Cracroft-Brennan
> <in...@londwill.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >In article <5idj1b$1...@news1.sol.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Olav_St=E5le_S=F8vi
> >k_of_Camster?= <oso...@sn.no> writes
> >>"Countess Snowdon" - is she "Countess of Snowdon"
> >>
> >For god sakes, Olav!! Why can't you do what everyone else does and GO
> >AND LOOK IT UP IN A REFERENCE BOOK??????
> >
> >Every time you post a message, it costs each and every one of us to
> >download your message.
> >
> >In the case of UK readers, it's costing us all about 10p or 15p EACH to
> >download EVERY one of your messages. And why should I spend good, hard
> >earned money to read a damn silly question as you've posted above????
>
> message ??????? Holy cow.......
>
> Thank God I live in the "good ol' US of A" after hearing that.....
>
> It's $ 19.95 a month + tax...unlimited use = $ 21.50 a month total !!
>
>
> hugz,
>
> Kevin
Actually, I live in the UK and am hooked up to Virgin Net, which costs
me £10 a month and nothing else, except local phone call rate.
Louis Epstein
Pamela Gray (pg...@fox.nstn.ca) wrote:
: Kelsoman wrote:
: >
: snip
: >
: > Oh my goodness....you are kidding me ? You have to pay for each
: > message ??????? Holy cow.......
: >
: > Thank God I live in the "good ol' US of A" after hearing that.....
: >
: > It's $ 19.95 a month + tax...unlimited use = $ 21.50 a month total !!
: Not for long, heh heh. ISPs are wising up and thinking of changing
: their pricing policy; and telcos are getting sick of Internet users clogging
: up their lines for sweet f.a. :->
Speaking as an ISP who competes on price,this is a nightmare.
james
Olav Ståle Søvik of Camster wrote:
>
> Sorry, these articles were sent by mistake! Ignore them!
Hamster, stop spamming!