Eric Schmidt, Google's chairman and former chief executive,
admitted to the U.S. Senate antitrust subcommittee that Apple's new Siri
personal assistant technology is a "significant development" in search
and could pose a threat to his company's core business.
The comments came in the form of a statement to the subcommittee in
response to questions from the senators after a hearing in September, as
noted by Neowin.net.
Schmidt's remarks, however, may be best taken with a grain of salt, as
letter's objective is clearly to downplay Google's prominence, while
highlighting its competitors.
The executive took special care to call out Siri as a new development that might supplant Google's search engine.
"Even in the few weeks since the hearing, Apple has launched an entirely
new approach to search technology with Siri, its voice-activated search
and task-completion service built into the iPhone 4S," he wrote.
Schmidt even went so far as to cite two publications for calling Siri a
"Google killer" and Apple's "entry point" into the search engine
business.
In the letter, Schmidt backpedaled from a previous statement in
September 2010 where he had denied that Apple and Facebook were a
"competitive threat."
"My statement was clearly wrong," he said. "Apple’s Siri is a
significant development—a voice-activated means of accessing answers
through iPhones that demonstrates the innovations in search."
"Google has many strong competitors and we sometimes fail to anticipate
the competitive threat posed by new methods of accessing information,"
Schmidt added, noting that Google competes against search engines
(Microsoft's Bing, Yahoo!), specialized search engines (Kayak, Amazon,
WebMD, eBay), social networks (Facebook, Twitter), commercial software
companies (Apple, Microsoft), mobile apps and direct navigation.
Apple unveiled Siri in October as a
prominent new feature
of the iPhone 4S. The software, which Apple originally purchased in
2010, is currently in beta, though, and has experienced some
embarrassing outages in the first weeks of usage.
In what could be considered a confusing mixed message from Google executives, Android chief Andy Rubin
dismissed
Siri last month. He said he doesn't believe that phones should be
assistants and doubted whether people should communicate with their
phones.
To the disappointment of those who readily declare Android as a dominant
winner, Schmidt denied in his letter that Google has a "dominant
position in the smartphone market." He cited a
recent study from research group comScore as saying that "Android operates on only 34.1 percent while Apple’s iOS runs on 43.1 percent."
In fact, his comment is misleading, as comScore's figures relate to the
whole mobile and connected device market. The actual report noted that
Android does have the highest share in the smartphone market, with 43.7
percent in August. That difference is largely due to the fact that Apple
has an unchallenged lead in the tablet market, as Android tablets have
failed to gain much traction.
Schmidt also downplayed Google's role in the search engine market, instead attributing it to hard work and luck.
"I would disagree that Google is dominant," he said after senators
asserted that Google is approaching a monopoly. "By investing smartly,
hiring extremely talented engineers, and working very, very hard (and
with some good luck), Google has been blessed with a great deal of
success."
For their part, senators maintain that Google's 65 percent market share
of all U.S. Internet searches, 94 percent share of the European market,
and 97 percent share of all smartphone searches give it substantial
market power that approaches a monopoly.