Articles for Issue 1

[Socionics Magazine]

So far, here's what we have in terms of articles for the first issue:

- I'm writing an article about how intuition manifests in Alpha NTs vs
Gamma NTs and Beta NFs vs Delta NFs.

- Cone says he'll submit something in the next few weeks.

- Brilliand has offered to let us publish some of the articles he
posted on the16types.

This is a great start, but I think we need more :P

[Cone]

Well, since you call this a "magazine", nilv, I suppose you were
thinking of it being more free-form with various features? I think
that'd be a cool idea. :)

Then, we just need some "features".

So here are a few ideas:

- An "editorial" typelist, or a typelist written by some group within
the magazine community
- Some other things... (can't think now, ugh.)

But, you know, something like that. :)

On Feb 19, 1:09 am, Socionics Magazine <socionics.magaz...@gmail.com>
wrote:

[nilv]

Yeah, that's what I had in mind. I like the idea of the typelist.

Here are a few more ideas, some of which are more feasible than
others:

- Short function/type/relation descriptions. Pick a different
function, type, or intertype relation each issue and have a bunch of
different people write short descriptions (a couple sentences - a
paragraph max) on their subjective experience of said function/type/
relation. Could be interesting.

- Translations. In the 'Socionics Magazine' thread on the16types,
07490 pointed out that translating Russian socionics articles goes a
long ways. Now, I don't speak Russian, but taking machine translated
articles and turning them into readable English articles can be really
helpful, so maybe for each issue we could pick a Russian socionics
article that we deem especially relevant and translate it into actual
English.

- Typing 'contests.' If we had people of known types submit anonymous
descriptions of themselves, we could publish those descriptions, and
people reading the magazine could send in guesses as to their types.
Then in the next issue we could reveal their actual types and publish
the statistics for how many people guessed which correct and incorrect
types.

- Short tests. Maybe like checklists for distinguishing between
different dichotomies, groups, etc.