Einstein, Schrödinger and Sage

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Markendeya Yeddanapudi

unread,
Feb 15, 2026, 8:40:21 AM (4 days ago) Feb 15
to ggroup, thatha patty, vignanada...@gmail.com, viswanatham vangapally, Satyanarayana Kunamneni, Jayathi Murthy, kantamaneni baburajendra prasad, TVRAO TADIVAKA, Nehru Prasad, rctate...@gmail.com, Neeraja Nadikuda, Narasimha L Vadlamudi, tnc rangarajan, Ravindra Kumar Bhuwalka, S Ramu, Ramanathan Manavasi, A. Akkineni, Anisha Yeddanapudi, Abhishek Pothunuri, Aparna Attili, Abhinay soanker, dr anandam


--
MarA Dialogue in the Himalayas: Albert Einstein, Erwin Schrödinger, and a Himalayan Sage

Setting: The same cave in the high Himalayas. Snow peaks shimmer under moonlight. Einstein sits quietly near the fire. The Sage remains still as ever. Footsteps approach along the stone path. A familiar figure enters, brushing snow from his coat.


Schrödinger (smiling):
Albert, I suspected I would find you here—arguing with eternity.

Einstein (standing to greet him):
Erwin! Have you come to defend your cat in these mountains?

Schrödinger:
Only if it is both alive and dead at this altitude.

Sage (with gentle amusement):
Welcome. In this cave, even paradox removes its shoes.


On Reality and Observation

Einstein:
We were discussing whether consciousness is woven into the fabric of reality—or merely an observer of it.

Schrödinger:
Ah. The old tension between relativity and quantum theory. Albert prefers a universe that exists serenely without our interference.

Einstein:
And you, Erwin, tolerate a universe that hesitates until it is observed.

Schrödinger:
Not quite. I proposed the wave equation to describe the evolution of quantum systems. It is perfectly deterministic—until measurement. The trouble begins there.

Sage:
Measurement is a form of attention.

Schrödinger (turns to the Sage):
Indeed. In quantum theory, the act of measurement appears to select one outcome from many possibilities. The wave function evolves smoothly, yet observation seems to collapse it.

Einstein:
Which is precisely what troubles me. The moon does not vanish when we cease to look at it.

Sage:
The moon does not vanish. But your experience of the moon arises in awareness.

Schrödinger (thoughtful):
I have long suspected that consciousness is singular—that the multiplicity of minds is an appearance. In my philosophical reflections, I leaned toward the idea that there is only one consciousness.

Einstein:
Yes, I recall. You were influenced by certain Eastern philosophies.

Schrödinger:
I found resonance with the Upanishadic idea that the Atman and Brahman are one—the inner self identical with the universal ground.

Sage:
When the wave forgets it is water, it fears collapse.


On the Nature of Unity

Einstein:
I sought a unified field theory—a single mathematical structure embracing gravitation and electromagnetism. I believed unity must be expressible in equations.

Schrödinger:
And I believed unity might lie deeper—in consciousness itself.

Sage:
Both of you seek unity through different doors. One through matter, the other through mind.

Einstein:
But can unity truly be found without mathematics? Mathematics has revealed the curvature of space-time, the constancy of light.

Sage:
Mathematics reveals structure. Meditation reveals source.

Schrödinger:
Professor, you once said that the most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.

Einstein (nods):
Yes.

Schrödinger:
What if its comprehensibility arises because mind and cosmos are not ultimately separate?

Einstein:
You suggest that the order of thought and the order of nature share a common root.

Sage:
As flame and light share fire.


On Time and the Eternal

Einstein:
In relativity, time is not absolute. Past, present, and future form a four-dimensional continuum.

Schrödinger:
And in quantum mechanics, time enters differently—more as a parameter than as a dimension like space.

Sage:
In meditation, time dissolves altogether.

Einstein:
Dissolves? Or merely loses psychological weight?

Sage:
When there is no movement of thought, what is time?

Schrödinger:
An interesting question. The flow of time may be tied to entropy, to the statistical behavior of systems. Yet subjectively, time stretches and contracts with attention.

Einstein:
But the equations remain indifferent to our feelings.

Sage:
And yet you discovered them through feeling—through intuition.

Einstein (after a pause):
Yes. The equations came later.


On Technology and Responsibility

Schrödinger:
Science has opened the atom. With that came both understanding and destruction.

Einstein (somberly):
I warned of the bomb, yet my letter helped begin the chain of events.

Sage:
Knowledge without wisdom is incomplete. Power without inward clarity disturbs the balance.

Schrödinger:
Then must science be restrained?

Sage:
Not restrained—illumined.

Einstein:
Illumined by what?

Sage:
By the recognition that the knower, the known, and the act of knowing arise together.


The Cat, the Moon, and the Self

Einstein (with a faint smile):
So, Erwin—does your cat survive in this cave?

Schrödinger:
In the formalism, it remains in superposition. In experience, it resolves into one state.

Sage:
The cat is neither the problem nor the solution. The question is: who is the observer?

Schrödinger:
If consciousness is singular, then the observer is not separate from the observed system.

Einstein:
But such metaphysics cannot replace empirical verification.

Sage:
Nor can measurement replace direct awareness.


Toward Silence

The fire crackles. Outside, wind moves across the Himalayan ridges.

Schrödinger:
Albert, perhaps your deterministic universe and my probabilistic one are both approximations.

Einstein:
Approximations of what?

Schrödinger (glancing at the Sage):
Of a deeper unity neither wave equation nor tensor calculus can fully express.

Sage:
Truth is not threatened by equations. But it is not confined by them.

Einstein:
Then what remains?

Sage:
Sit.


The three men fall silent.

Einstein, who bent space and time.
Schrödinger, who gave form to the quantum wave.
And the Sage, who dissolved both into awareness.

In the stillness of the Himalayas, relativity, quantum uncertainty, and ancient insight do not argue. They rest—like three different descriptions of a single, immeasurable reality.

Rajaram Krishnamurthy

unread,
Feb 16, 2026, 11:44:43 PM (2 days ago) Feb 16
to Markendeya Yeddanapudi, Chittanandam V R, Dr Sundar, Ravi mahajan, Venkat Giri, SRIRAMAJAYAM, Mani APS, Rangarajan T.N.C., Srinivasan Sridharan, Mathangi K. Kumar, Venkat Raman, Rama, Sanathana group, Societyforservingseniors, thatha patty, Kerala Iyer, vignanada...@gmail.com, viswanatham vangapally, Satyanarayana Kunamneni, Jayathi Murthy, kantamaneni baburajendra prasad, TVRAO TADIVAKA, Nehru Prasad, rctate...@gmail.com, Neeraja Nadikuda, Narasimha L Vadlamudi, tnc rangarajan, Ravindra Kumar Bhuwalka, S Ramu, Ramanathan Manavasi, A. Akkineni, Anisha Yeddanapudi, Abhishek Pothunuri, Aparna Attili, Abhinay soanker, dr anandam
aTTACHED WORD DOC DISCUSSING IN DETAIL WHERE CONSCIOUSNESS, TIME AND SPACE ARE ONE AND THE SAME KR IRS 17226

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to thatha_patty...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLHPWxpu4czADrzcx6PbH2%3DwwhnHLaS7Rj4%2ByO%3DVb0pZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
A Dialogue in the Himalayas.docx

Markendeya Yeddanapudi

unread,
Feb 17, 2026, 12:33:48 AM (2 days ago) Feb 17
to Rajaram Krishnamurthy, Chittanandam V R, Dr Sundar, Ravi mahajan, Venkat Giri, SRIRAMAJAYAM, Mani APS, Rangarajan T.N.C., Srinivasan Sridharan, Mathangi K. Kumar, Venkat Raman, Rama, Sanathana group, Societyforservingseniors, thatha patty, Kerala Iyer, vignanada...@gmail.com, viswanatham vangapally, Satyanarayana Kunamneni, Jayathi Murthy, kantamaneni baburajendra prasad, TVRAO TADIVAKA, Nehru Prasad, rctate...@gmail.com, Neeraja Nadikuda, Narasimha L Vadlamudi, tnc rangarajan, Ravindra Kumar Bhuwalka, S Ramu, Ramanathan Manavasi, A. Akkineni, Anisha Yeddanapudi, Abhishek Pothunuri, Aparna Attili, Abhinay soanker, dr anandam
Rajaram Sir,
I salute you.My God you match chat GPT in expanse.To understand your contribution,one needs a very high standard.I am still reading and trying to understand completely.I am provoking not only chat gpt but also you,its equal or better.
YMS
--
Mar

Rajaram Krishnamurthy

unread,
Feb 17, 2026, 3:46:00 AM (2 days ago) Feb 17
to Markendeya Yeddanapudi, Chittanandam V R, Dr Sundar, Ravi mahajan, Venkat Giri, SRIRAMAJAYAM, Mani APS, Rangarajan T.N.C., Srinivasan Sridharan, Mathangi K. Kumar, Venkat Raman, Rama, Sanathana group, Societyforservingseniors, thatha patty, Kerala Iyer, vignanada...@gmail.com, viswanatham vangapally, Satyanarayana Kunamneni, Jayathi Murthy, kantamaneni baburajendra prasad, TVRAO TADIVAKA, Nehru Prasad, rctate...@gmail.com, Neeraja Nadikuda, Narasimha L Vadlamudi, tnc rangarajan, Ravindra Kumar Bhuwalka, S Ramu, Ramanathan Manavasi, A. Akkineni, Anisha Yeddanapudi, Abhishek Pothunuri, Aparna Attili, Abhinay soanker, dr anandam
welcome sir I also enjoy your thoughts KR
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages